“Break It Down!”

There is way more to say about this topic than I plan to elevate. I do want to make a point that most Republicans are desperately trying to obfuscate, ignore, or otherwise baffle you with bullschitt about the matter. First, the issue.   

In recent political developments, Donald Trump has advocated for a mid-decade redistricting of Texas, a move that would reshape congressional and legislative districts outside of the traditional decennial cycle. Historically, states have redrawn their legislative and congressional district boundaries every ten years following the release of new Census data. However, Trump has called for an off-cycle redistricting initiative in Texas.

There has been widespread discourse about this proposal signaling an attempt to capitalize on shifting demographics and strengthening Republican’s advantages in a rapidly evolving state. Proponents claim that such a move would correct perceived imbalances or respond to legal challenges, while critics argue it represents a partisan strategy to consolidate power and potentially disenfranchise voters. The debate around mid-decade redistricting in Texas reflects broader national tensions over redistricting, gerrymandering, and the ongoing battle for political control in key states.

Republican frequently point to so-called Blue States and the ways they have used gerrymandering as a tool to advantage Democrats. They seem to present that point, as though it were the proverbial coup de grâce. In fact, Blue and Red states have used gerrymandering quite liberally, no pun intended. However, two points that in their telling tend to get whitewashed…or perhaps to turn a less charged phrase, overlooked, are:

1. This proposal, as presented, will significantly reduce Black (and diminish Hispanic) representation in the state that, not coincidentally, has more Black people than any other state in the Union.
2. Redistricting, in Texas, as in many other states, is constitutionally tied to the Census. This mid-decade initiative is not tied to official Census data, not in fidelity with the Constitutional requirement, and not in concert with historical precedent.

These two important considerations are facts that will be absent most of those indignantly framed arguments the GOP hangs it hat on. They are, good, bad, or indifferent, making the case for this questionable act, because Mr. Trump is nervous about his ability to hold on to the GOP majority in the House of Representatives. Consequently, he is now taking a stance that represents an about-face to his heretofore enthusiastically held positions on merit and entitlement. Instead of promoting GOP Representatives earn their seats, based on the redistricting results of the last Census…until the next one as is the norm, he said yesterday, “I got the highest vote in the history of Texas, as you probably know, and we are entitled to five more seats.” That’s not the way that works, Mr. President. It’s not the political equivalent of Name That Tune. You don’t get to say, because the House GOP numerical advantage is at risk, I deserve 5 more seats…regardless of when the next Census is scheduled. Yet here we are. “Trump’s Push For Mid-Decade Redistricting In Texas: “We’re Entitled To 5 More Seats!””

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime.

A new post is published each Wednesday.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects related to this post, consult the links below:

(Large Language model-based writing assistant AI Tool was used composing this post).

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/05/trump-texas-redistricting-00493624

Trump’s Push For Mid-Decade Redistricting In Texas: “We’re Entitled To 5 More Seats!”