The Voters (Delegates) Have Spoken: Hillary is the (Democratic) Nominee

It’s time to Break It Down!

As we greet this new day on planet Earth, there are a number of great truths; few more apparent than that there is a gulf separating the two major political Parties, a space that spans poles (no pun intended). The philosophies and ideologies that frame the views and the accompanying talking points of the Republican Party, which convened last week in Cleveland, are frequently pitted in diametrical opposition to those of the Democratic Party, now underway in Philadelphia.

More often than not, it seems the media, intent upon the devolution of all civil discourse, fans the flames of discord. It may be to garner ratings, or to gain clicks, or to sell newspapers or magazines. Regardless of the intended purpose, far too regularly, a media outlet is front and center in the midst of the resultant turmoil.

Last week, the GOP gave us four days flush with varying degrees of drama. Let me say up front, the early analysis suggests that, at least in the short term, the drama was a plus for Candidate Trump. He started this week with a 6-point bounce, and a lead of then Democratic presumptive nominee Clinton. According to CNN, Trump leads Clinton 44% to 39% in a four-way matchup between the Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians, and the Green Party. In a head-to-head match-up with Clinton, he leads 48% to 45%.

If anything I suppose those results give credence to the maxim, “There is no such thing as bad publicity…also framed as “All publicity is good publicity.” At least it seems that way when you consider the chaotic nature of the GOP’s four idyllic days in “Believe-land.” To summarize that amazing moment in time, the highlight of which was formally elevating Donald Trump to the status of Party Nominee, here are my personal highlights:

  • Monday – Melania bites Michelle. No, not in a man bites dog kind of way. Rather that is hipster patois for copying one’s style, copping one’s moves, or in this case plagiarizing one’s speech. That may actually have been the low moment of the Convention. It was certainly the negative event that consumed the most media time and energy. It totally “trumped” the day’s earlier events, when a small group of Delegates attempted briefly to oust Trump as the Nominee-in-waiting, and Ohio Governor, John Kasich opted to follow through on his pre-announced plans to skip the Convention (held in Cleveland).
  • Tuesday – Dr. Ben Carson uses Alinsky, Lucifer, and Hillary in the expression of a singular circular thought. It was the kind of classic Carson logic with which we have become all too familiar. You know, the sort that assails Obamacare, asserting it is the worst thing for America since slavery. I suppose I should give him credit for ascribing to slavery a negative light. OK, thumbs up, Doc.
  • Wednesday – Ted Cruz addresses the GOP Convention, and, after having advised Mr. Trump of his intentions days in advance, and providing a copy of his remarks earlier in the day, to absolutely no one’s surprise, he refused to endorse Donald Trump. Suddenly what had been reported by CNN for two days was treated as a shocking development…by the media. There was gnashing of teeth and wringing of hands, and a general post-mortem consensus that Mr. Trump should have deleted Senator Cruz from the program, given what he knew, and/or Senator Cruz should have, knowing what he knew, just stayed home. But where would the drama have been in that?
  • Thursday – Donald Trump talks for 75 minutes in his acceptance speech, a modern day record, before finally “humbly and gratefully” accepting his Party’s nomination. In his uniquely “humble” way, he declared himself the only person capable of resolving the litany of problems he enumerated that require fixing, in order to make America safe, work, first, one, and of course, great…again. If I didn’t know better I’d think a master Reality TV producer engineered their convention. But that’s just me.

This week, it is the Democrat’s turn to step up and show their wares. At the outset, it looked at though the media and the Convention were jointly committed to create just as much excitement, or drama, if you will, as the Republicans brought us last week. Even before the Monday opening, Wiki-Leaks released a series of emails Sunday that showed high ranking officials of the DNC conspiring to devise schemes to denigrate Senator Sanders. The resulting fallout led to the resignation of the DNC Chair, Debbie Wasserman Shultz. Initially, DWS planned to gavel the Convention into Session, and to gavel it closed, even though she had resigned. This…was an incredibly bad idea. Yes, the optics were less than desirable, but more importantly the concept itself was profoundly flawed.

Fortunately, sanity prevailed, and some Democrat, or perhaps several, figured out that the most effective strategy to pursue if you dig yourself into a hole…is to stop digging. To that end, the erstwhile Chair relinquished the remainder of her duties and responsibilities, and stepped to the sideline. The result was, after looking and sounding like a hair-on-fire story throughout Sunday night, and Monday morning, the Democrats reinvented the opening day by the time the Convention was gaveled into Session at 4:00 p.m. Monday afternoon.

The actual Convention session went off largely without a hitch. In fact, the proceedings were so understated from a drama point of view, that CNN’s resident GOP counter-programming critics were either mostly silent, or altogether AWOL. That means, unlike the Trumpster Fire that lasted all four days of last week’s Convention, Day 1 of the Democrat’s Convention was a critical success.

Even after losing DWS, there was still a level of anticipation that Bernie’s supporters would bow up and crash Mrs. Clinton’s party. The media kept trying to keep viewers on the edge of their seats with what ifs, and queries of what might happen next. By the time the evening was over, Senator Sanders, who wrapped up the evening, had given a clear and passionate endorsement of Secretary Clinton, Senator Cory Booker, NJ, gave a stem-winding speech, Senator Elizabeth Warren gave a strong speech touting the candidate that drew high praise, and the cherry on top, though it was not the final speech, was a masterpiece by First Lady Michelle Obama.

By now, we have like last week, traversed half of the Convention. Last night’s highlight, naturally, was a speech by former President Bill Clinton who wove a series of anecdotes and short stories into a compelling tapestry about Mrs. Clinton. There was a considerable amount of discussion about whether Bill would be able to effectively humanize his wife. In all fairness, he has frequently had a blind spot when it comes to Mrs. Clinton. Last night, that did not appear to be the case.

Clinton’s speech on Clinton was substantial in every conceivable dimension. However, it was Bernie Sanders, in fact, who delivered Tuesday’s highlight. The Clinton and Sanders teams negotiated an agreement that led to the Senator formally making a motion that led to the Party nominating Hillary Clinton by acclamation. While I am sure there will be strains of the Never Hillary Movement in the future, that single act moved mountains in diffusing the most substantive elements of any remaining resistance. In effect, Sanders demonstrated he would continue to do his part to unify the Party.

With that said, when Mrs. Clinton, who appeared via satellite Tuesday night, formally accepts the Nomination tomorrow, it will mark the moment when the gloves come off…for all parties. The sparring between the two sides has grown in frequency and tenor in recent weeks. However, methinks, you ain’t seen nothing yet. Years from now, when we look back on it, the crossfire between Clinton and Trump is likely to be deemed legendary. In just under 15 weeks, this whole thing will be a wrap, kit and caboodle. Today we can reflect on Mrs. Clinton having become America’s first female major Party Nominee for President. Indeed, The Voters (Delegates) Have Spoken: Hillary Is the (Democratic) Nominee!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cnn.com/?refresh=1

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/25/cnn-trump-clinton-poll-newday.cnn

http://www.ktiv.com/story/32477726/2016/07/19/melanias-speech-under-fire

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Carson

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/25/dnc-convention-michelle-obama-entire-speech-sot.cnn

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/cory-booker-rousing-dnc-speech-rise/story?id=40870837

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/25/dnc-convention-elizabeth-warren-entire-speech-sot.cnn

http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-bernie-sanders-convention-speech-transcript-20160725-snap-htmlstory.html

https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/watch-donna-braziles-full-speech-at-the-democratic-national-convention/2016/07/26/18425980-5377-11e6-b652-315ae5d4d4dd_video.html

http://www.whio.com/news/news/national/read-bill-clintons-speech-democratic-national-conv/nr5gZ/

Trump Towers Over the Never Trump Movement: Drops the Title “Presumptive!”

It’s time to Break It Down!

Last night was the culmination of 13 months of what can only be appropriately deemed a Trump tour de force. We can now say Trump has been marching inexorably toward the nomination as the Republican’s 2016 candidate for President since June 2015. Last night, Donald J. Trump, Jr. exulted in the dual honor of reading the results of the New York Delegate distribution, and simultaneously putting his father over the requisite 1,237 (of 2,472) Delegates that Party rules require in order for a candidate to clinch the GOP Nomination. There was more business to be handled, for sure, such as Convention Chair Paul Ryan announcing the official tabulated results, but for all practical purposes, it was over when Don, Jr. read the State of New York’s Delegate designation.

The reality, of course, is it ended long before that. It ended when Trump cobbled together sufficient momentum to force his final two GOP Primary competitors, Ted Cruz and John Kasich, to yield and shut down their respective campaigns. A few diehards refused to abandon the notion of Never Trump. This is a concept, by the way, that I repeatedly suggested, quickly after it emerged, had no shot at succeeding.

The Republican National Convention Kicked off Monday. During the afternoon session a few rogue Delegates attempted to launch an insurgency, mainly to disrupt the proceedings, but with no real hope of actually executing any kind of bloodless coup, politically speaking. Trump delegates, Convention Chair Ryan, and Convention Whips made sure noting came of that wild hair.

Having dispensed with the untoward impulses relatively early, the GOP seemed on the road to zeroing in on how best and most fervently to bash Mr. Trump’s opponent in the November Election, Hillary Clinton. However, the highlight of Monday evening festivities was to be a featured appearance by Melania Trump, who was tasked with the unenviable assignment of humanizing the candidate, her husband. By most accounts, her speech was successful, if not in providing any special anecdotes or insights about her husband or his psyche, in casting her as and individual who could proficiently calm her nerves long enough to read from a teleprompter (Donald must be really proud) and convey how she transitioned from having been an immigrant to becoming a citizen…the right way.

While the early feedback noted that she did not accomplish Job 1, framing Donald in a softer light, she did, as a non-politician, hold her own in front of God, a teleprompter, a packed arena, and a television audience of tens of millions. Granted, her husband is the politician, not her, so she should get points for completing the assignment without committing any discernible faux pas. But wait, before the Quicken Loans Arena could be cleared (Monday evening’s proceedings did run long), a counter-theme emerged. It appeared, in weaving her story of the evening, Mrs. Trump may have appropriated substantial parts of several passages from a speech that Mrs. Obama delivered during the 2008 Democratic Convention. There is much more that could be said about this matter, but I suspect you’ve already seen or heard it. In the unlikely event you missed it see the last link below.

Back to the subject at hand, the title makes clear this post focuses on Donald Trump’s biggest victory to date in his quest to become President of the United States. You may recall, the magic number GOP candidates were aiming for and needed to become the Party’s nominee was 1,237. Here is a breakdown of the total Delegates won by candidate:

  1. Donald Trump – 1,725 (1,237 Required)
  2. Ted Cruz – 475
  3. John Kasich – 120
  4. Marco Rubio – 114
  5. Ben Carson – 7
  6. Jeb Bush – 3
  7. Rand Paul – 2

When one thinks back and recalls that at one point the Republican field of candidates consisted of 17 candidates, it is certainly appropriate to appreciate that Donald Trump not only survived the crucible of a rigorous campaign, he fundamentally restructured the Republican Party. It may not have a revolution, in Bernie Sanders parlance, but it certainly was a revolt. That may sound extreme at first glance, but think about it in big picture terms. In June of 2015, when he announced his candidacy, Trump’s odds of winning the GOP Nomination were slim, possibly slim and none. While it is conceivable that Ben Carson, and or, Carly Fiorina had longer odds, being a Black Republican or a woman (and like Trump, having no previous political experience) and all, virtually every other candidate was high on the scale of political hierarchy that includes Governors, former Governors, and Senators.

For a little perspective, here is a list of Mr. Trump’s 16 vanquished rivals:

  1. Jeb Bush (Former Governor of Florida)
  2. Ben Carson (Retired Neurosurgeon)
  3. Chris Christie (New Jersey Governor)
  4. Ted Cruz (U.S. Senator, Texas)
  5. Carly Fiorina (Former Business Executive)
  6. Jim Gilmore (Former Virginia Governor)
  7. Lindsey Graham (U.S. Senator, South Carolina)
  8. Mike Huckabee (Former Governor of Arkansas)
  9. Bobby Jindal (Former Governor of Louisiana)
  10. John Kasich (Governor of Ohio)
  11. George Pataki (Former Governor of New York)
  12. Rand Paul (United States Senator, Kentucky)
  13. Rick Perry (Former Governor, Texas)
  14. Marco Rubio (U.S. Senator, Florida)
  15. Rick Santorum (Former U.S. Senator, Pennsylvania)
  16. Scott Walker (Governor of Wisconsin)

To go even further back down memory lane, there were times in the early going when many, if not most folks, thought Trump would never actually enter the race, and then a prevailing sentiment was he never release a Financial Statement, and I’m sure almost everyone knows he still has not released his taxes. This last point should not be downplayed. Every candidate since Richard Nixon has done so. By flouting convention and refusing to do so, Mr. Trump is almost certainly setting a precedent that others will surely follow in the future.

The Convention is halfway over. Last night, Tiffany and Donald Trump, Jr., (two of Trump’s children) along with Chris Christie and Ben Carson spoke. From my vantage point, Tiffany gave the speech folks anticipated Melania might have, and Don, Jr. spoke, both about his father and about the political dynamics of the country. He may have been the star of the evening. Christie assiduously prosecuted Hillary Clinton for the vast array of Republican grievances, while Carson ridiculed her links to Saul Alinsky…and his links to Lucifer, and therefore, her links to Lucifer. You had to see it to appreciate it, or to not appreciate it sufficiently.

Just for kicks, last night’s speakers mentioned Mr. Trump and Mrs. Clinton a lot. However, it is worth noting that, according to CNN, they mentioned Clinton more – Trump 61, Clinton 79. Nothing will unify the GOP like voicing opposition to the Clintons. While we’re at it, it is also interesting to note that 80 (3%) of the 2,472 Delegates to the Convention are African American. That’s more than at Romney’s Convention in 2012, so I suppose the GOP can feel pretty good about itself on that score. It will be interesting to see if the Democrats can match the GOP’s enthusiasm. I’m confident they will exceed the level of diversity.

Tonight’s speakers will include Newt Gingrich, his wife Callista, and Trump’s son Eric. The Party’s Vice Presidential Nominee Mike Pence will also appear. Then of course, Thursday will mark the piece de resistance, when Trump and Pence will officially accept their Nominations. Each day of the Convention has bee thematically labeled. The themes and days were paired, as follows:

  • Monday – Make America Safe Again
  • Tuesday – Make America Work Again
  • Wednesday – Make America First Again
  • Thursday – Make America One Again

Don’t worry about the themes though. If last night was any indication, adherence to it may be hit or miss. I will certainly not suggest the Convention has been compelling TV.

The Party and Mr. Trump will likely feel much better about last night’s session than the one Monday night. It is unlikely Tuesday’s speakers will have anything approaching the SNAFU emanating from Melania’s “borrowed” comments,” which Trump and the Party denied, deflected, and/or took an opportunity to dissemble when discussing (as is the Trump-world fact-free way).

Don Jr., however, did not escape scrutiny.  As it turns out, Huffington Post reported he did use words from a passage in the May issue of a conservative periodical called “The American Conservative.” According to HuffPo, the author of the article, F.H. Buckley assisted Trump with his speech, and granted him permission to use the passage in question.  The bottom line is, this is not deemed to be as serious as Melania’s case. I can look ahead and see that this will be an issue moving froward. Look out Philly! See the next-to-the-last link for a more detailed discussion of this instance. This brings me full circle back to the main point…”Trump Towers Over the Never Trump Movement: Drops the Title ‘Presumptive!”‘

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

 Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melania_Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Jr.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivanka_Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiffany_Trump

http://www.starnostar.com/Barron-Trump-Wiki-Barron-William-Trump-Wiki/25731/Star-Celebrity/

http://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/07/19/rnc-convention-jeff-session-nominates-donald-trump-sot.cnn

http://www.newsobserver.com/news/politics-government/election/article90627912.html#emlnl=Breaking_News_Alerts

https://www.yahoo.com/news/outbreak-dissent-trump-powers-toward-prize-071013170–election.html?ref=gs

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-republican-convention-2016-live-1468976559-htmlstory.html

http://wgntv.com/2016/07/19/donald-trump-formally-nominated-as-republican-presidential-candidate/

http://www.wthr.com/story/32480241/donald-trump-clinches-gop-nomination-mike-pence-nominated-for-vp

http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2016/jul/19/trump-triumphs-as-gop-nominee-completing-stunning-/

http://www.denverpost.com/2016/07/19/donald-trump-republican-president-nomination/

http://www.thedailybeast.com/cheats/2016/07/19/donald-trump-officially-nominated-at-rnc.html?via=desktop&source=copyurl

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P16/R-Alloc.phtml

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quicken_Loans_Arena

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/black-republican-delegates-speak-trump-convention-n586776

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/us/elections/2016-presidential-candidates.html?_r=0

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-jr-plagiarism_us_578eef03e4b04ca54ebf7b6c

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/trailguide/la-na-republican-convention-2016-live-melania-trump-s-rnc-speech-appears-to-1468901655-htmlstory.html

Black Lives Matter: Of That I Am Certain!

It’s time to Break It Down!

Fact. There are many Americans who simply refuse, under any circumstances, at any time, in any place, to consider the prospect their country in general, and especially themselves in particular, ever tolerate even the hint of a suggestion that they harbor the most remote scintilla of racist thought, deed, or action in exercising their life’s functions. In fact, if you happen to suggest that one of these people is racist, that person will deny it, quickly and robustly, and then just as speedily and fervently, insist that by the mere introduction of such an idea, you, in fact, are the racist.

While I firmly believe this to be true of Americans as a whole, it is in my opinion super-turbo-fied for white Americans. Take a moment to breathe deeply before opting to just go directly to your neutral corner and employ searing eyes and an angry heart to throw shade at such a bodacious premise, or at me for displaying the temerity to author it.

The thing is, there is well-documented, widely accepted American history that explains, at least in part, why so many otherwise intelligent and reasonable Americans think that way, even in the 21st Century. There are, in some people’s mind, perfectly logical events that underpin the fundamental structure of this premise. Like it or not, this is a thing, a very inconvenient American truth. Let’s take a walk back in the historical annals of time and space.

Meet Dred Scott! Dred Scott sued for his freedom, on the grounds that he and his wife had for years lived in a free state. His case eventually went to the Supreme Court. In his March 6, 1857 ruling, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court Roger Taney declared that Scott had no right to sue because as a black man he was never intended to be an American.

Speaking of the clause in the Declaration of Independence that “all men are created equal,” Taney wrote:

“It is too clear for dispute, that the enslaved African race were not intended to be included, and formed no part of the people who framed and adopted this declaration.”

Taney went on to say the following:

“The negro has no rights which the white man is bound to respect”

“It is difficult, at this day, to realize the state of public opinion in relation to that unfortunate race which prevailed in the civilized and enlightened portions of the world at the time of the Declaration of Independence, and when the constitution was framed and adopted. But the public history of every European nation displays it in a manner too plain to be mistaken. They had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior race, and altogether unfit to associate with the white races, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect, and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit.

Chief Justice Taney wrote the majority opinion. The court held that Scott was not free based on his residence in either Illinois or Wisconsin because he was not considered a person under the U.S. Constitution–in the opinion of the justices; black people were not considered citizens when the Constitution was drafted in 1787. According to Taney, Dred Scott was the property of his owner, and property could not be taken from a person without due process of law.

In fact, there were free black citizens of the United States in 1787, but Taney and the other justices were attempting to halt further debate on the issue of slavery in the territories. The decision inflamed regional tensions, which burned for another four years before exploding into the Civil War.

Now most people would read the aforementioned and undoubtedly be prone to say, that was a 159 years ago. The United States fought a war (the Civil War) that exorcised the stench of the demons of that ludicrously inhumane ruling. Without a doubt America and black Americans, yes we are Americans, were freed from the heinous circumstances that made such a reckoning by the foremost jurist in the highest court in the land even possible. And you would be right…as it relates to most people.

But most is not all, and in this instance, it is particularly important in the case of one among those numbered in the some, not in the most. Mike Huckabee, former Governor of Arkansas, former Fox News Host, & 2016 GOP Presidential Candidate articulated a belief last summer, while he was pursuing the 2016 Republican nomination for President, that the Dred Scott Decision, rendered by the Taney Supreme Court…is still the law!

Interestingly enough, he made this argument while defending an individual’s right to ignore a Supreme Court ruling. While defending Kentucky Clerk Kim Davis’s refusal to issue marriage licenses out of her religious opposition to same-sex marriage, Mike Huckabee said:

“The Supreme Court’s 1857 ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford – which held that all blacks, free or enslaved, could not be American citizens – is still the law of the land even though no one follows it.” 

“I’ve been just drilled by TV hosts over the past week, ‘How dare you say that, uh, it’s not the law of the land? Because that’s their phrase, ‘it’s the law of the land.’ Michael, the Dred Scott decision of 1857 still remains to this day the law of the land, which says that black people aren’t fully human. Does anybody still follow the Dred Scott Supreme Court decision?’”

And lest you feel compelled to dismiss this Troglodytic comment as a mere aberration by this pillar of contemporary Republicanism, the former Governor, former Fox News host, and former Presidential candidate has somehow convinced himself that federal “enabling legislation” is necessary in response to court rulings, or they don’t count. Further, he’s also endorsed pre-Civil War nullification schemes and suggested he might deploy federal troops on U.S. soil to prevent women from exercising their reproductive rights. But I digress.

This, all of this, from Robert Taney’s legalistic machinations, to Mike Huckabee’s political ramblings explains, in no uncertain terms why Black Lives Matter (BLM). Almost anyone who follows the Movement, either as a an activist/member, or from an intellectual and/or academic perspective, can tell you that neither the Movement nor the acronym BLM is intended to convey the sentiment that Black Live Matter and others do not, or that Black Lives Matter more than others, or that Black Lives Matter because they are more important than White Lives, Asian Lives, Latino Lives, Native American Lives, or any other lives.

Patrisse Cullors, Opal Tometi, and Alicia Garza founded #BlackLivesMatter in 2013. The movement began with the use of the hashtag #BlackLivesMatter on social media, after the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the shooting death of African-American teen Trayvon Martin. Black Lives Matter became nationally recognized for its street demonstrations following the 2014 deaths of two African Americans: Michael Brown, resulting in protests and unrest in Ferguson, and Eric Garner in New York City.

#BlackLivesMatter is an online forum intended to build connections between Black people and their allies to fight anti-Black racism, to spark dialog among Black people, and to facilitate the types of connections necessary to encourage social action and engagement. All in all, I think that is a noble endeavor.

BLM’s Home Page footer includes the following defining language:

#BlackLivesMatter is an ideological and political intervention in a world where Black lives are systematically and intentionally targeted for demise.  It is an affirmation of Black folks’ contributions to this society, our humanity, and our resilience in the face of deadly oppression.

BLM, in an effort to help familiarize interested parties with their operational objects shares a list of Guiding Principals on its Home Page. Those ideals include:

  • Diversity
  • Restorative Justice
  • Unapologetically Black
  • Globalism
  • Collective Value
  • Transgender Affirming
  • Black Women
  • Black Villages
  • Empathy
  • Black Families
  • Loving Engagement
  • Queer Affirming
  • Intergenerational

I’m not a #BLM activist. However, as a black man in America, born and raised in this country, I absolutely understand why the Movement is not only justified it is essential. I unequivocally reject the notion that #BLM is racist. In fact, the Movement is a direct response to disparate treatment on its face. In addition, just in case anyone actually needs to be reminded, it is necessary because of a daunting history of minimizing and denigrating responses to Black Life.

That history, in and of itself would justify such a Movement. However, as I noted above, there is also a contemporary mindset that embraces the notion that Black Lives are not equal, and have no rights that need not be respected (by White men). In an America in which an individual counted among our nation’s thought leaders (Pease do not suggest a man who has served as Governor of a sovereign State of the United States of America is not a significant molder and shaper of public opinion) can openly hold, project, and promote those views…“Black Lives Matter: Of That I Am Certain!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.ushistory.org/us/32a.asp

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aia/part4/4p2932.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdYSPhETw2Q

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-Fifths_Compromise

http://blacklivesmatter.com

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-police-blacklivesmatter-idUSKCN0ZP04A

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Lives_Matter

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/04/opinion/the-truth-of-black-lives-matter.html?_r=0

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/11/politics/rudy-giuliani-black-lives-matter-inherently-racist/index.html

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Stop+and+Frisk

http://www.nyclu.org/issues/racial-justice/stop-and-frisk-practices

http://www.nytimes.com/topic/subject/stop-and-frisk-policy-new-york-city-police-department

http://www.ccrjustice.org/home/what-we-do/issues/discriminatory-policing

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/09/19/nyregion/stop-and-frisk-is-all-but-gone-from-new-york.html

http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2016/07/11/vice-president-joe-biden-intv-black-lives-matter-giuliani-comment-sot-tapper-tsr.cnn

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/10/philando-castile-killing-nra-racial-divide

http://rare.us/story/nra-finally-comments-on-castile-shooting-after-criticism-heres-what-they-said/

https://latest.com/2016/07/civil-rights-organization-nra-finally-addresses-philando-castile-shooting-calls-it-troubling/

http://uproxx.com/news/nra-dallas-shooting-statement-philando-castile/

https://www.rawstory.com/2016/07/black-dallas-surgeon-tells-police-i-support-you-that-doesnt-mean-i-dont-fear-you/

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20160711-black-doctor-describes-night-of-dallas-police-shooting-i-will-care-for-you.-that-doesn-t-mean-that-i-do-not-fear-you.ece

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-dallas-chief-20160711-snap-story.html

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20160709-open-carry-creates-confusion-during-dallas-police-ambush-but-supporters-say-law-works.ece

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc-news/watch/man-falsely-accused-in-dallas-speaks-out-721474115753

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/about-that-good-guy-with-a-gun/2016/07/11/3ed098fe-47a2-11e6-acbc-4d4870a079da_story.html?wpisrc=nl_headlines&wpmm=1

http://www.snappytv.com/tc/2349535

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/12/opinions/is-black-lives-matter-racist-john-mcwhorter/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2016/07/12/don-lemon-shares-racist-encounter-tsr.cnn

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2016/07/transcript_of_president_obamas.html

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/crime/headlines/20160712-at-memorial-service-obama-comforts-dallas-challenges-the-nation-over-race-violence.ece

http://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/headlines/20160712-in-dallas-speech-obama-holds-up-mirror-to-a-tense-sorrowful-nation.ece

http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/07/baton_rouge_obama_police_shoot.html

Biggest Day of Election 2016…So Far!

It’s time to Break It Down!

In a Presidential Election year, there is one day bigger than all other days. Election Day. As days go, it is the ultimate arbiter in determining who won, who lost, and by how much. Countless micro-statistics will emerge from tens of thousands of tabulators across the country.

Yesterday was not that day. It was, however, huge. A number of the day’s key events fundamentally shaped, altered or completely re-defined the tone and tenor of how the next 125 days, or until the votes are counted on Tuesday evening, November 8, 2016, will unfold.

To summarize briefly, the day included:

  1. A statement in an unannounced news conference from FBI Director James Comey, regarding the Clinton e-mail scandal
  2. The kickoff of the joint appearance phase of the Democratic Campaign, featuring Hillary Clinton and President Obama at a Clinton rally in Charlotte, NC
  3. In a turnabout from the 2014-midterm elections, Democrats from across the state, including the Gubernatorial Candidate, the Lt. Governor candidate, the U.S. Senate candidate, the U.S. House of Representatives candidate, and the State Secretary of Labor candidate, were all in the building. In 2014, Democrats from across the spectrum, nationwide, fled the President like the plague. While he was polling anemically at the time, it is worth noting, he had already won two national elections. Most of the folks who fled President Obama lost anyway. Who knows? Perhaps he could have helped them.
  4. A trump Rally in Raleigh, NC, undoubtedly designed to offset the planned Clinton rally in Charlotte, and serendipitously timed to enable The Donald to slam the decision by the FBI not to recommend pressing charges against Clinton.
  5. In light of item number 3, above, it is worth noting that Republican Senator Richard Burr and GOP Governor Pat McCrory both found reasons to be out-of-State during Mr. Trump’s rally in the State Capital. It also warrants mentioning that Senator Burr, as I have noted in another blog post, is currently planning to skip the Convention in Cleveland.
  6. The much less publicized, but no less critical reaction that one CNN news story entitled “Sanders supporters meltdown over FBI’s Clinton decision”

Last weekend, Secretary Clinton spent 3 and half hours of a holiday (4th of July) weekend cloistered with the FBI, answering questions about her e-mail server(s). This “voluntary” interview, and it was voluntary; Clinton had actually been requesting it for at least a year, followed by several days an unscheduled, and by most accounts, faux pas of an encounter between Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former President Bill Clinton, potential first, First Dude, on The AG’s plane. Reportedly, Mr. Clinton’s plane was located near Ms. Lynch’s plane on the Tarmac.

Said meeting was purported to have lasted about half hour or so. Not surprisingly, the Republican Party in general, and the Trump Campaign in particular, raised holy heck about the two meeting. It was perceived as highly suspect by virtually all of Mrs. Clinton’s opponents, and certainly regrettable by many of her supporters. The furor that arose following the “chance” encounter prompted AG Lynch to hold a press conference during which she pledged to follow the recommendations of the FBI and federal prosecutors. At that time she indicated she’d made the decision months ago to take this action. That is altogether possible, but the timing, following so closely her meeting with Mr. Clinton, gave Trump and the GOP solid fodder for several news cycles.

After Clinton’s FBI interview Saturday morning, it was generally expected that the Bureau would tale a week or two to mull over the interview before responding. To that end, Tuesday’s response was a surprisingly quick turnaround. And regardless of which side you were on, Director Comey’s announcement had something for you.

First and foremost, the BFD (see Joe Biden on Obamacare); Comey declined to recommend charges against Secretary Clinton. This really was the total obliteration of the elephant in the room. With one fowl swoop, Mr. Comey said, ”No charges are appropriate in this case,” and simultaneously cleared the deck for the Clinton campaign to complete the process of wrapping up the Democratic nomination in Philadelphia, and took the last breath of oxygen from the Sanders campaign. The acronym BFD is apt here, and by no means hype or overstatement.

Alternately, the Director, whom hard core Democrats know is not only a registered Republican (W Bush’s AG), but also active to the extent that he contributed to the McCain and Romney campaigns in ’08, ’12, respectively, disputed many of the assertions previously made by the secretary. In broad strokes, during his 14-minute report, he said:

  • The Clinton State Department was extremely careless in handling emails
  • Mrs. Clinton did share at least 115 emails deemed classified/8 deemed top secret
  • Security culture at the State Department was lacking
  • Hostile actors gained access to the email of others with whom Clinton communicated
  • Evidence of violations was found
  • He found no evidence of intent to share classified or top secret information
  • He found no evidence of intent of disloyalty to the U.S.

At least 5 of those bullets points will serve to ensure that this conversation lives throughout the election process. Trump/GOP talking points are in the bank.  Nevertheless, the record must reflect that the FBI Director did say also the FBI found no evidence of a cover-up, and no evidence that Clinton’s personal email domain was hacked.  Comey put a fine point on the matter by saying “Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case.”

In yesterday afternoon’s Clinton rally, which I had the opportunity to attend, the President, turned campaigner-in-chief, and candidate Clinton, worked a raucous crowd at the Charlotte Convention Center. The pair formed a 1-2 punch that excoriated Trump’s ideas, more than the candidate himself. The wall, belittling other races and ethnic groups, banning Muslims, etc., are all ideas that drive a wedge between people rather than bring them together. But beyond the absence of substance from Mr. Trump, the President noted that Mrs. Clinton’s experience is the preeminent super qualifier. In fact, he said, she is the most qualified man or woman to ever seek the office of President of the United States.

For her part, Hillary praised the President for rescuing the nation from a second Great Depression. She asserted that her job, as his successor, would be to secure the change that he facilitated and to take us further in areas of clean energy, continuing to de-nuclearize the world, raise the minimum wage, implement debt-free college, and free community college, and provide a plan to pay for it all, among other things.

Anyone who has ever attended a venue in which the President is featured knows that going to see the President requires a commitment. Folks lined up in advance, stood in the heat waiting for the doors to open, waited for hours once inside, all to see and hear the two candidates whom they so greatly respect and admire. It was not at all surprising that many replied in classic black church call-and-response style, “Preach,” when President Obama said he knew he was preaching to the choir.

In current polling, President Obama has a 50% approval rating on average, which is near historic for a President approaching the end of his second term. The obvious offshoot of that turn of events is that the chickens, in this case scared Democrats; came home to roost. As noted in the third enumerated item above, a plethora of democrats showed up for Mrs. Clinton’s rally. And make no mistake about it, although it was Clinton’s rally, and she paid for the Air Force One flight to Charlotte, the PA Announcer introduced Barack Obama, President of the United States, when the pair came out of the tunnel, they stood behind the Seal of the President of the United States, and he was the keynote speaker, the last to take the podium. It had to be special to return to the City in which he was bestowed the nomination in 2012, in the state he turned blue in 2008, and boost the candidacy of the last person he vanquished in his initial run, also in 2008. It was a good day and a great event for her; it was an outstanding day for him.

Last night the scene shifted to Raleigh, the State’s (North Carolina) Capital. Trump was Trump. He spoke for over an hour (66 minutes) and his bombast was aimed at crooked Hillary, clueless Obama, and a host of rigged systems, including the economic system (people have dropped out of the search for employment and are not counted in determining unemployment rates), the political system (Louisiana was stolen from him, even though he got the most votes, and the system is rigged, even though he won…go figure), and the justice system (how could Hillary not be indicted). He emphasized that Clinton put the safety of the entire country at risk; he noted in particular that her judgment is horrible.

In perhaps his biggest stretch, he accused the Clintons of bribing Attorney General Lynch, who may be considered to serve as AG in a Clinton Administration. This alleged bribe somehow resulted in Clinton not being charged.  Her reward?  Continued employment in Mrs. Clinton’s administration, if she wins. A boon she would, of course be deprived of, should Mrs. Clinton be forced to withdraw from the race. Never mind that as a former AG, Lynch would almost certainly command a much higher salary in the private open marketplace.

Mr. Trump has had a fairly uneven ride on his way to nailing down the nomination. Despite having amassed the number of delegates necessary to secure the nomination, a many Republicans have been reticent to endorse him, more than a few have said they will not vote for him, some even saying they will vote for the Democrat, one is suing to be released from voting for him at the Convention, and at least one, George Will, left the Party, because of Trump. Given that well-documented unevenness, it is no surprise there were prominent no-shows last night in Raleigh. Senator Richard Burr said he needed to be in Washington. Campaign spokesperson Jesse Hunt framed it thusly:

  • “After multiple terror attacks associated with the Islamic State this week, Senator Burr is attending to his duties in Washington as Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman.”

In a fluke of nature, Governor McCrory was also unavailable. His spokesman, Ricky Diaz said:

  • “The governor’s office said yesterday that he will be heading out-of-state today for a long-scheduled trip with the First Lady, so he’s unable to attend tonight’s event with Mr. Trump.”

If anybody can relate to that cold shoulder Mr. Trump was feeling on a warm summer evening in North Carolina, I’m sure it’s President Obama. Of course, I don’t imagine Mr. Trump will be reaching out to the guy he doesn’t even believe is an American (but does think is a Muslim), anyway.

And then there is Bernie Sanders; perhaps more aptly, there are his supporters. Director Comey’s announcement seemed to have made for one last twist of the dagger for some of the Senator’s most loyal supporters. Among them, there is a vocal minority who hoped, even advocated for a Clinton indictment, which in turn could catapult Senator Sanders back into the nomination conversation. This eternal spring of human breast hope exists, despite a strong indication that if Hillary had been thwarted, Vice President Biden would quite possibly have been inserted as the nominee.  But I digress.

The so-called bitter-enders, folks aligned in both the Sanders and Trump camps, pointed to yesterday’s pending decision as the “FBI Convention.” Oh well, it’s fair to say, in retrospect, that dog didn’t hunt. When Comey made the announcement, there was a social media eruption. The tart responses included the following tweets:

Rosario Dawson

‪@rosariodawson

The ‪#SystemIsRigged indeed. So disgusted. ‪#Demexit ‪#Dexit ‪#BernieOrBust ‪#OurRevolution ‪#NotMeUs ‪#UpToUs ‪#TimeIsNow

https://

twitter.com/sgttim911/stat

us/750375702822842368 

1:29 PM – 5 Jul 2016

581 581 Retweets
776 776 likes

Mark Ruffalo

‪@MarkRuffalo

We’re in trouble.

11:38 AM – 5 Jul 2016

1,534 1,534 Retweets
2,907 2,907 likes

Bill Cimbrelo ‪@Bill_Cimbrelo

Today marks a turning point. We now have unequivocal proof of how bad things are. It can only serve to strengthen our resolve ‪#NeverHillary

1:48 PM – 5 Jul 2016

324 324 Retweets
378 378 likes

Teachers For Bernie ‪@BernieTeachers

Just fire them all and get rid of the ‪@FBI. They don’t uphold laws and have proven to waste taxpayer funds.

https://

twitter.com/Conservative_V

W/status/750360975744774148 

12:31 PM – 5 Jul 2016

79 79 Retweets
87 87 likes

Arabs For Bernie ‪@ArabsForBernie

We keep asking how many mistakes can one candidate for ‪#POTUS claim before it’s too many. ‪#ClintonEmails ‪#Comey ‪#MadamMistakes

1:01 PM – 5 Jul 2016

97 97 Retweets
109 109 likes

User Actions

Follow

Shaun King

Verified account

‏‪@ShaunKing

Where FBI Director Comey openly said if it was anybody other than Hillary, they’d have serious consequences.

  • RETWEETS 1,972
  • LIKES 1,799
  • 12:49 PM – 5 Jul 2016

1,972 retweets

1,799 likes

Reply

Retweet

2K

Like

1.8K

 #BERNIEFACTS ‪@Bernie_Facts

Retweet if the Democratic Party is dead to you

1:38 PM – 5 Jul 2016

587 587 Retweets
356 356 likes

Nate Summers ‪@Cable90

I guess if you are rich and have political power like ‪@HillaryClinton not even the FBI can touch you ‪#BernieOrBust ‪#StillSanders

2:18 PM – 5 Jul 2016

147 147 Retweets
169 169 likes

More

Star Stuff

@Statistar30

If you’re an uber rich old white lady -u can break the law, help rig a primary, trade gvmnt favors for $ & never face consequences.Yay Comey

There has been a fair amount of discourse regarding whether Sanders’ supporters as a collective, will join Team Hillary for the closing thrust of the campaign, as Hillary’s supporters did with Team Obama in 2008.  Senator Sanders has said he is going to the Convention and endeavor to alter the platform.  He has also said he will do everything in his power to defeat Donald Trump.  However, he has said, and many of his supporters parrot, that it is up to Hillary to make the changes (essentially adopting his positions) to persuade his supporters to join her.  In a quirk of contemporary politics, the system is deemed rigged by some Sanders supporters because the Campaign with the most votes has not fallen on its sword and conceded to the Campaign that competed admirably…but finished with fewer votes.  It’s a bit of a head scratcher, but we’ll soon see how that works.  The Convention kicks off July 25th.

There have been a lot of hugely important days in the 2016 Campaign. There are sure to be more. But when all things are considered, few have been or are likely to be more important that yesterday; at least not until November 8th. So I stand by my initial premise; yesterday was theBiggest Day of Election 2016…So Far!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

 Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/02/politics/clinton-meets-with-fbi-as-part-of-email-probe/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/fbi-statement-email-server-hillary-clinton-james-comey/index.html

http://freebeacon.com/politics/media-shreds-clinton-fbi-report-email-scandal/

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2016/07/02/republicans-pounce-fbis-clinton-interview/86641502/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-interviews-clinton-over-email/2016/07/02/dd024480-4074-11e6-84e8-1580c7db5275_story.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/obama-clinton-campaign-charlotte/index.html

http://wavy.com/2016/07/05/donald-trump-holds-rally-in-raleigh/

http://www.bellinghamherald.com/news/politics-government/article87729127.html

http://www.wcnc.com/news/local/president-obama-hillary-clinton-arrive-in-charlotte-for-campaign-rally/264711390

http://www.cnn.com/2016/07/05/politics/bernie-sanders-fbi-hillary-clinton-email/index.html

http://www.witn.com/content/news/Trump-blasts-Clinton-during-Raleigh-rally–385631841.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Comey

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

Word Association: Trump = Quixotic!

It’s time to Break It Down!

As virtually every lucid American knows, Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican candidate for President. In becoming so, he has crafted his own fairy tale of a personal story, defeating sixteen major candidates along the way, many of them GOP heavyweights. When he announced his candidacy a little over a year ago, most people chuckled and presumed he would be relegated to a veritable trash bin of also-rans by the advent of the first couple of primaries. There being no shame in my game, I freely admit, I was one among the collection of most people.

However, let the record reflect, I became a believer sooner than most. It is quite possible I watched the progression of the race closer than many people did. In doing so, I noticed what to me was the development of an interesting phenomenon, and it emerged quickly.

In his campaign launch, Mr. Trump skewered Mexican immigrants, calling them, among other things drug dealers and rapists, as he offered, upon his personal authority, Mexico does not send us its best. He pledged to build a wall, and not just to erect it, but he insisted that he would force Mexico to pay for the wall.

On its face, this seemed to cast Trump’s kickoff as not just inauspicious, but divisive, troubling, and almost certainly, quickly disqualifying. The thing is it did not play out that way. Yes, his strident commentary was a trending topic for a few days. But any great clamor of disgust and disbelief was offset by a populist attaboy that while not rising to the level of groundswell was clearly palpable.

Then there was the case of the inconvenient war hero. Donald Trump questioned whether Arizona Senator John McCain, who was held as Prisoner of War (POW) for five and a half years by the North Vietnamese, was a war hero. As Trump put it, “I like people who weren’t captured.” While Senator McCain called on Trump to apologize to military families, particularly those of POW’s, he did not make a point of taking on Trump in a personal frontal assault. Several of the other sixteen candidates did though, perhaps seeing this as an opportunity to make quick work of the upstart Trump.

Next up, enter South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham, who defended his friend’s (Senator McCain) war record, and called Trump’s “antics” the last straw, and the multi-billionaire himself a jackass. Graham laid it all on the line, saying:

“I can understand being frustrated about immigration, but there’s no justification to slander a bunch of people that are hardworking folks. This is a line that is crossed. I think the American people, the caucus-goers; the primary voters are going to fix this. To the other candidates, this is your chance to do the right thing and disassociate yourself from somebody who has basically shown a lack of judgment to be commander-in-chief and to be President of us all.”

Shortly after Lindsey Gram’s appeal, Trump made a campaign trip to South Carolina. During the rally, in Graham’s home state, he thoroughly dissed the Senator, and topped off his rant by revealing the Senator’s cell phone number to the crowd,  a television audience, and America at large.

Among the rest of the GOP field, former Texas Governor Rick Perry answered the call most fervently. He aggressively called out Trump for having attacked Senator McCain’s war hero bona fides. At worst, it was a bad move; at best, it did nothing to bolster his campaign. He could take solace in having stood up and done the right thing. Alas, by shortly after Labor Day he was forced to suspend his campaign. Even though he had significant Super PAC support, he found himself unable to raise sufficient funds through traditional campaigning to keep his run afloat.

Donald J. Trump entered the 2016 Presidential race June 16, 2015. Rick Perry exited the race September 11, 2015. Once again 9/11 was a bad day, at least symbolically for Perry and his supporters. More important, in less than three months, I totally re-evaluated my position on Donald Trump and the degree to which he was a player among the Republican field. Before fall, and long before the fist primaries, I argued that Trump was not only for real, but I was certain he had a great shot to be the last person standing when the GOP dust settled. And here he stands.

The question now is what, if anything, does he stand for, as he and the GOP approach this month’s Republican National Convention. I have written before about Mr. Trump’s mercurial tendencies as it relates to the issues he supports and defends…or despises and attacks. If you ask Mr. Trump, he might tell you he is famous for his brand, and that his brand is that of a wealthy, successful, did I say wealthy, very wealthy businessman.

It is true that Mr. Trump owns and runs lots of businesses, and that he has earned billions of dollars. It is also true that he has lost lots of money, and filed for bankruptcy multiple times; at least four, I believe. But who’s counting?

Aside from his self-proclaimed business acumen, his foray into the political arena means its fair game to take a look at his positions on the major policy issues that confront our nation on a daily basis. As commander-in-chief, he will be called upon to navigate, with the help of his cabinet, our great ship of state, through the difficult currents of war, peace, the economy, immigration, and a host of other pressing matters.

With that in mind, here are ten issues upon which Mr. Trump zigged and then subsequently zagged:

  1. Debt – In March, Mr. Trump told the Washington Post that he would eliminate the $19 Trillion national debt “Fairly quickly, over a period of eight years.” By April he told Fortune that he could only pay off a percentage of the debt over a period of ten years. He was vague on the actual amount. He later told CNN that if the U.S. were unable to pay back its debt in full, “I would borrow, knowing that if the economy crashed, you could make a deal.” It should be noted that economists have denounced this strategy.
  2. Minimum Wage – Recently Mr. Trump gained lots of attention for his stance on the federal minimum wage, currently $7.25 an hour. He tweeted May 11, that “Goofy Elizabeth Warren lied when she says I want to abolish the Federal Minimum Wage. See media – asking for increase!” However, that has not always reflected his posture. November 11, he answered a debate question about raising the minimum wage, saying, “I would not do it.” May 8, he told ABC that he is “looking at an increase, but I haven’t decided in terms of numbers. But I think people have to get more.” The same day he told NBC “I would like to see an increase of some magnitude. But I’d rather leave it to the states. Let the states decide.” Not surprisingly, some media outlets, including The Washington Post, argue, “In the context of the policy debate, these phrases mean exactly nothing.” At least some Republicans are seeking clarification. The rest of America likely perfectly understands.
  3. Taxes – Similar to Mr. Trump’s minimum wage views, his tax plan elicited elevated scrutiny. Trump, in classic GOP fashion, promised tax cuts…for the wealthy. Conservatives, however, have accused him of backtracking and planning to raise taxes on the wealthy. Oh my! The Washington Post and MSNBC are among those saying that people overreacted, and that Trump never actually flip-flopped on tax breaks for the rich. Trump explained to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos that taxes on the wealthy are definitely a part of his plan, “but by the time it’s negotiated, they’ll go up.” The confusion may very well be unwarranted, a result of Trump’s typically vague policy statements. But that still doesn’t explain his April 21, statement, in which he told the “Today” show’s Savannah Guthrie that he does believe in raising taxes on the wealthy. And let’s not forget that in 1999, Trump advocated a one-time tax of 14.25 percent on Americans worth $10 million or more. The tax hike would have been the largest in history, in terms of total dollars.  Oops!
  4. Temporary Ban on Muslim Immigration – December 7 (the anniversary of the Pearl Harbor attack) the Trump campaign issued a press release stating “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country’s representatives can figure out what is going on.” Recently Mr. Trump walked back this controversial stance, telling Greta van Susteren that the ban was “only a suggestion.” He insisted the measure would be temporary. She asked him if he wanted to back off the idea. Trump responded, “Sure I’d back off on it. I’d like to back off on it as soon as possible, because frankly, I’d like to see something happen.” Just in the past few days, he has raised the stakes and reframed the discussion by de-emphasizing Muslims, and elevating the countries from which they hail. While visiting his golf course in Scotland over the weekend, he told reporters, “I want terrorists out. I want people that have bad thoughts out. I would limit specific terrorist countries and we know who those terrorist countries are.”  Can you say bait and switch?
  5. Abortion – May 10, Trump told FOX anchor Bill O’Reilly “I will appoint judges that will be pro-life.” He even claimed, “The biggest way you can protect” the sanctity of life “is by electing me president.” Surprising, given that Trump was, by his own admission, “in a meek fashion pro-choice.” Trump told O’Reilly “we will see about overturning” Roe V. Wade, but just last month the candidate told CBS News that “at this moment the laws are set. And I think we have to leave it that way.” Trump has also taken criticism for comments he made about punishing women who violate abortion laws – comments he backtracked only hours later.
  6. Nuclear Proliferation – March 25, Trump spoke with the New York Times regarding his brand of foreign policy. Despite stating “I personally think it’s the biggest problem the world has, nuclear capability,” Trump seems unsure of whether he would oppose other countries expanding their nuclear programs. In the same interview, he explained that allowing Japan and South Korea to build nuclear arsenals was “a position that at some point is something that we have to talk about.” He added, “They’re going to want to have that anyway with or without me discussing it, because I don’t think they feel very secure in what’s going on with our country.”
  7. The Iraq and Afghanistan Wars – August 6, Trump claimed at a debate that, “In July of 2004, I came out strongly against the war with Iraq, because it was going to destabilize the Middle East. And I’m the only one on this stage that knew that and had the vision to say it.” He has also stated frequently that he opposed the war even before it started. Yet, numerous fact checkers have subsequently found no trace of Trump’s vocal opposition to the war prior to the March 2003 invasion. The Huffington Post, PolitiFact, and The Washington Post (twice), have researched his claims and found not a shred of evidence to support them. He also changed his position on the war in Afghanistan. October 6, he said, “We made a terrible mistake getting involved there in the first place.” Fast forward to October 20, when he claimed, “I never said that.” Go figure!
  8. Torture – During the course of the March 3 debate, Trump stated that “We should go for waterboarding and we should go tougher than waterboarding” in the fight against terrorism. Previously, on December 2, Trump told Fox News “The other thing with the terrorists is you have to take out their families.” Debate moderator Bret Baier pointed out that targeting families would be illegal, and the military would refuse to carry out illegal orders. Trump replied, “They won’t refuse. They’re not going to refuse me. Believe me.” The next day, apparently after checking with someone who actually knows the law, predictably, he reversed field and told the Washington Post, “I do, however, understand that the United States is bound by laws and treaties and I will not order our military or other officials to violate those laws and will seek their advice on such matters.” There is a point at which stuff such as this stops being funny and starts being scary, when you consider this guy will be one of the Final Two pursuing the office of President.
  9. Attack Ads (on GOP and on Hillary) – May 11, Trump told the AP that he may avoid running attack ads against Hillary Clinton in the general election. “I just don’t find them to be very effective,” he explained. “I’ve had over $100 million in negative ads spent on me and every time it’s boosted my numbers.” But Trump has arguably become famous for his negativity on the campaign trail, criticizing opponents on both sides of the political spectrum. He routinely called Sen. Ted Cruz “lyin’ Ted” and accused John Kasich of being an “absentee governor.” Just two days ago, Trump’s official Instagram account posted a video that depicts Hillary Clinton laughing over the burning ruins of the U.S. embassy in Benghazi.
  10. Unifying the Party – When Donald Trump attended a meeting in Washington with the Speaker of the House, Paul Ryan, eyes and ears of the media and the nation were affixed and awaiting the result. Mr. Ryan was one of a number of prominent Republicans who were slow to endorse Trump, even after it was clear he would be the Party’s nominee. Ryan had told CNN “I’m just not ready to do that at this point. I’m not there right now.” For his part, Trump told the “Today” show May 4, “I am confident that I can unite much of” the GOP. But, May 9, he said, “Does [the party] have to be unified? I’m very different than everybody else, perhaps, that’s ever run for office. I actually don’t think so. I think it would be better if it were unified, I think it would be — there would be something good about it. But I don’t think it actually has to be unified in the traditional sense.” Mic drop?

There are plenty more where those came from, including Teleprompters, Hillary Clinton, and building and paying for a wall, of course, just to name a few. Ten is a nice round number though; I’ll stop there. I think that’s enough to make the point, Word Association: Trump = Quixotic (impulsive and often rashly unpredictable)!” Not exactly what you want in your next President…at least, I hope.

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

 Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.ijreview.com/2016/05/607467-11-things-donald-trump-changed-his-mind-about-after-securing-gop-nomination/

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-gop-trump-20150615-story.html

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/06/17/1394019/-Trump-calls-Mexican-immigrants-drug-dealers-and-rapists-crickets-from-the-GOP-field

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/20/politics/jeb-bush-john-mccain-donald-trump/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/politics/donald-trump-lindsey-graham-cell-phone/index.html

http://www.wsj.com/video/donald-trump-attacks-lindsey-graham-rick-perry/F6B39925-AE55-445B-8F7B-CF9B696353EE.html

https://rickperry.org

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/rick-perry-donald-trump-offended-remarks/story?id=32230412

https://rickperry.org

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/quixotic

It’s Never About Race; Or Is It?

It’s time to Break It Down!

Nearly two decades into the 21st Century, the phrase, “It’s not about race” is still nearly always a dead giveaway that, whatever the topic du jour, it is virtually always all about race. I’ll be the first to admit that is not the way it should be, or would be in a perfect world. Alas, we are not yet there.

Roughly two months ago, April 20, 2016, Treasury Secretary Jacob (Jack) Lew announced, in an open letter to the American people, that the newly redesigned $20 bill would feature abolitionist Harriet Tubman on the front. The $5 and $10 bills are also scheduled for redesign. The $10 note was due to be next in line, because of the need for security upgrades. However, as a result of an extensive 10-month survey and information gathering process, the Secretary was persuaded to leap over the less used $10 bill and move to the $20, a highly used bill that is a staple in ATM’s.

Secretary Lew’s determination to put Ms. Tubman on the next $20 bill was precipitated by an overwhelming response from Americans to a poll conducted by the grassroots group, Women on 20’s. Tubman was the first choice over three other contenders, including civil rights icon Rosa Parks, former First Lady and activist Eleanor Roosevelt, and Wilma Mankiller, the first female Chief of the Cherokee Nation. About his decision, Lew said:

“I have been particularly struck by the many comments and reactions from children for whom Harriet Tubman is not just a historical figure, but a role model for leadership and participation in our democracy.”

Harriet Tubman was a great American shero. Her exploits as a freedom fighter are legendary. Quite naturally, she took her work most seriously. In framing the context in which she viewed the struggle, Tubman once said:

“I would fight for liberty so long as my strength lasted.”

Fight, she did. She fought to free slaves, and she fought for women’s suffrage. Secretary Lew gleaned through polling, cards and letters, and from his own research that Tubman’s story was one of courage and commitment to equality; one that embodied the ideals of democracy that our nation celebrates. Through placing her portrait on the obverse side of the $20 bill, we will honor her, and continue to value that legacy. The reverse side will still feature the White House and the image of President Andrew Jackson.

Lew noted that the Bureau of Engraving and Printing would work closely with the Federal Reserve to speed up work on the new currency. The goal is for all three bills to go into circulation as soon as possible, consistent with security requirements.

Well, that seems straight forward enough. Hold up, wait a minute! Just when it appeared that it was possible for the federal government to work smoothly and efficiently to execute the people’s business, we are slapped in the face with the all too familiar reality of an intransigent and obstructionist elected politician. Representative Steve King, Iowa, recently introduced an amendment to bar the Treasury Department from spending any funds to redesign paper money or coin currency.

If this amendment were enacted, the Treasury Department’s plans to replace the image of Andrew Jackson with that of Harriet Tubman on the face of the $20 bill would be scuttled. Representative King has not publicly expressed a reason for putting forward the amendment. His office did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comment.

It is probably not news that Ms. Tubman would be the first African American to appear on American currency. While it is disappointing that Congressman King has decided, for reasons he has yet to see fit to share, to intervene and prevent the scheduled updating of our currency, despite existing security issues, I am also compelled to at least note the racial implications of his action.

Am I accusing Representative King of acting in a racist manner, or of having racist motivations? No, I am not. I am merely using my powers of observation, which I surely hope are not unique, and noting an apparent (at least to me) nexus between his action, and its evident impact. National media have reported news of his amendment. As such, while you may not have heard about it, the information is implanted in the public domain.

I noted in the very first sentence of this post, there is a propensity to throw a stone and hide one’s hand, when it comes to matters of race. But, as I stated then, the assertion that “it’s not about race,” is usually followed by a race-laden subject or discussion.

I will not deign to characterize the representative’s motives. Instead, what I will do is point out a few of the individuals and institutions that have gone on record as opposing the placement of Ms. Tubman’s image on the $20. An abbreviated list includes:

  1. Donald Trump
  2. Ben Carson
  3. Fox News
  4. Steve King

I’m sure there are others, maybe many, most, likely denizens of the GOP. For now, I will concentrate on those enumerated above. Each of them has invested considerable time, energy, and in the case of the three men, political capital, opposing any and everything even remotely associated with President Obama. Technically that does not include the Tubman initiative, since contrary to the opinion of the typical recalcitrant Obama hater; the decision-making regarding the currency was the purview of Secretary Lew, not President Obama. But, since Lew is an Obama appointee, I’ll play along and blame/credit the President for making the call. Whatever!

At this point, if I were engaged in a conversation about this matter, the other party or parties would be offering a litany of thinly veiled-to-totally transparent excuses attempting to defend the non-racial basis for this amendment. On a good day I would listen politely before dismissing the excrement as the half-baked crapola that it is. On a not-so-good day…well, let’s just hope it was a good day.

On this day, I’ve done my job. I have elevated the topic so that you may assess and evaluate for yourself. I leave you with this thought”It’s Never About Race; Or Is It?”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”

Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

 Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl0436.aspx

http://www.wmdt.com/news/politics-elections/iowa-congressman-wants-bill-to-block-20-tubman/40161176

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2015/05/12/harriet-tubman-20-dollar-bill/27173135/

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/21/politics/harriet-tubman-20-bill-steve-king/index.html

http://newsone.com/3465161/iowa-republican-lawmaker-block-harriet-tubman-20-bill/

http://www.wptz.com/politics/iowa-congressman-wants-bill-to-block-20-tubman/40161176

http://www.localsyr.com/news/iowa-congressman-wants-bill-to-block-20-tubman

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/harriet-tubman-20-bill-steve-king_us_57687124e4b0fbbc8beb6f67

http://www.eurweb.com/2016/06/gop-congressman-seeks-block-harriet-tubman-20-bill/

http://www.omaha.com/news/iowa/steve-king-seeks-to-block-u-s-currency-redesign-including/article_13795002-37f7-11e6-8251-ef4c15429934.html

http://www.blackdailynews.com/iowa-republican-lawmaker-wants-to-block-harriet-tubman-20-bill/

http://www.wmdt.com/news/politics-elections/iowa-congressman-wants-bill-to-block-20-tubman/40161176

http://www.womenon20s.org

http://amendments-rules.house.gov/amendments/KINGIA_289_xml62016115509559.pdf

http://downtrend.com/vsaxena/can-you-guess-why

http://www.vladtv.com/article/217670/trump-opposes-tubman-on-the-20-bill-calls-it-political-correctness

http://www.fox19.com/story/31777720/carson-opposes-tubman-replacing-jackson-on-20-bill

http://www.wnd.com/2016/04/fox-news-star-rails-against-tubman-on-20-bill/#!

This Time Orlando:”Pulse” of the Nation

It’s time to Break It Down!

Before preparing today’s post I decided to make a cursory inventory. At least six times previously, I have written about mass gun violence (in America). In the most recent instance before today I discussed the facts surrounding the June 17, 2015 shooting of the Charleston Nine at Mother Emanuel A.M.E. Church in Charleston, SC. Just two days shy of a year later, I find myself impelled to beat the drum once more. In an ironic twist, I visited the Mother Emanuel Church this weekend. As I was completing my exercise regimen, a spin bike ride, early Sunday morning, before my trip to Charleston, I read a news story and watched on CNN the story and gory details about the massacre at a gay club in Orlando named Pulse.

Each time such a tragedy befalls us; we as a society are diminished. It marks yet another cruel and crushing blow to a nation that I certainly wish to see aspire to emulate its better angels rather than the very worst in our human nature. I have ranted and railed repeatedly about the role easy access to firearms plays in the frequent carnage. I’ve discussed the prevailing politics, examined the NRA and its proxies (lobbyists and Congressmen and women), and lamented the lack of reform. Been there, done that, time and time again.

Not today. In honor of those 49 souls who ended their earthly assignment last Sunday morning at Pulse, I will make a brief introduction, and share the powerful words of one survivor. In the event you wish to reference my thoughts from previous posts on the subject, you can click on links below for several of them.

The list of dearly departed includes:

Edward Sotomayor, Jr.: – A 34 year-old resident of Sarasota, Florida; worked at a travel agency that catered to the gay community.

Stanley Almodovar, III: – A 23 year-old pharmacy technician. Hi smother made him a tomato and cheese dip that he never got to eat; he never returned home.

Luis Omar Ocasio-Capo: – A 20 year-old dancer at the club. He was one of the youngest to die.

Akyra Monet Murray: – An 18 year-old from Philadelphia, who was in Orlando on vacation with her brother after graduating from high school.

Luis S. Vielma: – A 22 year-old who worked at Universal Orlando. J.K. Rowling, creator of the “Harry Potter” book series tweeted “I can’t stop crying.” Vielma worked on the Harry Potter ride at Universal.

Juan Ramon Guerrero: – A 22 year-old worked as a telemarketer while attending the University of Central Florida.

Christopher Andrew Leinonen: – A 32 year-old, and was Juan Ramon’s boyfriend. He established a gay-straight alliance at his high school.

Eric Ivan Ortiz-Rivera: – A 36 year-old who had moved to Florida from Puerto Rico in pursuit of a better life.

Peter O. Gonzalez-Cruz: – A 22 year-old who worked at UPS, and who was known for memorizing the names of his regular customers.

Kimberley Morris: – A 37 year-old bouncer at Pulse. She enjoyed mixed martial arts and basketball.

Eddie Jamoldroy Justice: – A 30 year-old accountant who lived in downtown Orlando.

Enrique Rios: – A 25 year-old whom a cousin, Erick Leon, described as, “Loved by everyone who knew him.”

Anthony Luis Laureano Disla: – Born in San Juan, Puerto Rico, and settled in Orlando.

Jonathan Antonio Camuy Vega: – Worked in Audience Management for the current season of the singing competition at Telemundo.

Yilmary Rodriguez Solivan: – A 24 year-old, was friends with Jonathan Antonio.

Cory James Connell: – A 21 year-old was leaving Pulse with his girlfriend when the shooter, whose name I will not write, entered the club.

Mercedes Marisol Flores: – A 26 year-old; her father Cesar is heartbroken that his daughter was killed.

Deonka Deidra Drayton: – A 32 year-old, she was a bartender at Pulse.

Miguel Angel Honorato: – A 30 year-old; he lived in Orlando, and managed a Mexican restaurant in Sanford, Florida.

Jason Benjamin Josaphat: – A 19 year-old; he attended Southern Technical College in Orlando.

Darryl Roman Burt II: – A 29 year-old; he was an employee on the Jacksonville campus of Kelser University.

Juan Carlos Mendez Perez: – A 35 year-old, was the best salesperson his co-worker, Claudia Agudelo, ever met.

Luis Daniel Wilson-Leon: – A 37 year-old, and a friend of Juan Carlos.

Oscar A. Aracena Montero: – A 26 year-old, was celebrating the recent purchase of a home.

Simon Adrian Carillo Fernandez: – A 31 year-old who was Oscar’s partner.

Shane Evan Tomlinson: – A 33 year-old, who had performed with his band Frequency at another club earlier in the evening.

Amanda Avear: – A 25 year-old was on Snapchat at the club when the shooting started.

Martin Benitez Torres: – A 33 year-old was a student at the Tampa Bay campus of Ana G. Mendez University.

Gilberto Ramon Silva Menendez: A 25 year-old from Manati, Puerto Rico who worked at a Speedway Convenience Store. He had studies Health Care Management at Ana G. Mendez University in Orlando.

Javier Jorge-Reyes: – A 40 year-old from Guayama, Puerto Rico. He managed a Gucci Store in Orlando.

Tevin Eurgene Crosby: – A 25 year-old, who ran his own marketing company. He graduated from West Iredell High School in Statesville, NC in 2010.

Franky Jimmy Dejesus Velazquez: – A 50 year-old, he was a professional dancer.

Xavier Emmanuel Serrano Rosado: – A 33 year-old, he was a dancer, and proud of his son.

Joel Rayon Paniagua: – Grew up in Veracruz, Mexico; he lived near Tampa, and sent all his money home to family.

Juan P. Rivera Velazquez and Luis Daniel Conde: – Velazquez 37 and a hair stylist, and Conde 39 a make-up artist, were partners. They owned a salon together.

Juan Chevez-Martinez: – A 25 year-old who worked at a hotel.

Jerald Arthur Wright: – A 31 year-old; he worked at Disney World.

Leroy Valentin Fernandez: – A 25 year-old; he leased apartments for a living.

Jean C. Nives Rodriguez: – He bought his first home just over a month ago.

Rodolfo Ayalo-Ayalo: – A 33 year-old, he worked at OneBlood, a blood donation center since 2011.

Brenda Lee Marquez McCool: – A 49 year-old who has 11 kids, and beat cancer twice. Her son survived the shooting.

Angel L. Candelario Padro: – A 28 year-old who had recently moved to Orlando and started a job as a technician at the Florida Retina Institute.

Frank Hernandez: – A 27 year-old; he worked at a Calvin Klein store.

Paul Terrell Henry: – He was from Chicago, and had two children. His daughter Alexia recently graduated from high school.

Antonio Davon Brown: – A 29 year-old; he was a Captain in the U.S. Army Reserves, and a graduate of Florida A&M University.

Christopher Joseph Sanfeliz: – A 24 year-old, he worked at a bank.

Alejandro Barrios-Martinez: – A 21 year-old, he grew up in Cuba before moving to Orlando in 2014 to live with his father.

Geraldo A. Ortiz-Jimenez: – A 25 year-old, known as “Drake” to his friends, was a native of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic.

That completes a listing of biographical summaries of the 49 men and women who lost their lives a Pulse, as shared by CNN. It is without question, their abrupt departure from life, and especially from their friends and loved ones, is a tragedy of incalculable magnitude. I will not even attempt to put that into words. Instead, I will rely upon the insight and heart-rending sentiments of one survivor, Ms. Patience Carter.

The following is a poem she wrote Monday night, before she shared a person statement yesterday about her experience in the Pulse incident:

The  Guilt of Feeling Grateful to be Alive is Heavy

 “Wanting to smile about surviving but not sure if the people around you are ready.

As the world mourns, the victims killed and viciously slain, I feel guilty about screaming about my legs in pain.

Because I could feel nothing like the other 49 who weren’t so lucky to feel this pain of mine.

I never thought in a million years that this could happen.I never thought in a million years that my eyes could witness something so tragic.

Looking at the souls leaving the bodies of individuals. Looking at the killer’s machine gun throughout my right peripheral. Looking at the blood and debris covered on everyone’s faces. Looking at the gunman’s feet under the stall as he paces.

The guilt of feeling lucky to be alive is heavy.

It’s like the weight of the ocean’s walls crushing uncontrolled by levies. It’s like being drug through the grass with a shattered leg and thrown on the back of a Chevy. It’s like being rushed to the hospital and told you’re gonna make it when you laid beside individuals whose lives were brutally taken.

 The guilt of being alive is heavy.”

With that powerful personal testimony, I think it’s all been said. “This Time Orlando: “Pulse” of the Nation!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Orlando_nightclub_shooting

http://www.tampabay.com/news/publicsafety/crime/in-his-own-words-pulse-nightclub-shooting-survivor-patience-carter/2281662

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pulse_(nightclub)

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/13/us/orlando-victims-profiles/index.html

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/14/us/reconstruct-orlando-pulse-shootings.html?_r=0

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charleston_church_shooting

https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/2015/06/24/carnage-in-a-charleston-church-another-mass-murder/

https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/2014/06/18/dead-wrong/

https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/2014/05/28/another-shooting-pervades-the-american-psyche/

https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/2012/12/19/this-time-will-be-different/

http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com/2012/07/james-holmes-darkest-knight.html

https://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=5516202214514810687#editor/target=post;postID=474307075967394496;onPublishedMenu=posts;onClosedMenu=posts;postNum=256;src=postname

No Middle Ground: Welcome to the Age of Incivility

It’s time to Break It Down!

Before moving to concentrate on today’s post, I want to highlight an issue related to the special significance to the current political narrative. On Monday evening, CNN and the Associated Press declared that Hillary Clinton has crossed the threshold to reach the combined number of Pledged and Super Delegates requited to clinch the Democratic Presidential Nomination. The New York Times added its imprimatur yesterday morning.

That was all before taking into account the six Primary contests conducted yesterday in California, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Dakota, and South Dakota. The candidates are expected to split the 694 available delegates. Next Tuesday, Washington, DC will officially close out the 2016 Primary Election season. Twenty delegates are at stake there.

Let me be clear, the quest for determining the Democratic Party’s nominee for President ends “officially” in Philadelphia on July 28th, at the Democratic National Convention. That is an incontrovertible fact. There are expected to be 4,765 delegates to the Democratic National Convention, so a candidate needs a simple majority of 2,383 delegates to win the presidential nomination. However…for all practical purposes, the contest ended Monday evening, when Hillary Rodham Clinton became the Party’s presumptive nominee.

Bernie Sanders has done an incredible job with his campaign. He exceeded expectations, most likely, including his own. He engaged youth and Millennials in historic fashion. He has vowed to fight on until the Convention. At the outset, Senator Sanders argued that the country was poorly served by crony Capitalism and the Party’s reliance on big money donors, and its penchant for rewarding the financial industry with bank bailouts, the auto industry with its own bailout, and generally dismissing regular middle class Americans.

His message resonated with many Americans and as a result, he built a small donation based Campaign that rivaled the big PACs, in fundraising, and enabled the Senator to take his Campaign through the entire Primary Season in a competitive way. Alas, there was one major problem. Secretary Clinton held her own in the early contests in the Northeast, built a sizable lead in the South, and held on and in some cases expanded her margin as contests moved to the Midwest and the West. As she maintained and/or expanded her lead, the Senator was forced to pivot. He could no longer focused solely on the crony Capitalism argument; he added that the Party electoral process was also corrupt.

Since then, the Sanders Campaign has made a huuuuge issue of the Democrat’s Super Delegate process. He and his supporters also skewered the Democratic National Committee (DNC) Chairman, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, who is a Clinton supporter. Undoubtedly, the next seven weeks will be filled with intrigue and maneuvering as the Clinton and Sanders campaigns navigate and negotiate a truce that in the end must produce something between Détente and a unified Party.

The 2016 General Election is scheduled for Tuesday, November 8th, five months from yesterday. You can be sure I will have a lot to say about politics and the election in the coming weeks and months. In the meantime, with all due deference to Bernie Sanders for conceiving and constructing an outstanding and an incredibly productive effort, Secretary Clinton has fashioned a lead among Pledged Delegates, among Super Delegates, in the popular vote, and in the number of state contests won. Congratulations to Hillary Rodham Clinton on positioning herself to become the first female Presidential Nominee of a major Party in American History.

That highlight was longer than I intended. Let me move directly to addressing the main topic. As a nation, we have become a prickly lot. I’ve written volumes about the notion some Americans label us an Exceptional nation. Indeed, we have amassed many accomplishments that render us distinguished. Yet, I must inject, America has long held a rather high-minded view…of itself. A home team media; a biased political class of powerful elites armed with a self-serving agenda, often crafts this narrative. Regardless of its origin, millions of Americans routinely buy into or co-sign such views.

Regardless of the appellation applied to a particular age, whether in this country or others, the name often is intended to convey some positive aspect or attribute of society, or of it’s people. That is as true for the largely European Age of Enlightenment as it is for the current worldwide Information Age. As you may know, the Information Age, also known as the Computer Age, Digital Age, or New Media Age) is a period in human history characterized by the shift from traditional industry that the Industrial Revolution brought through industrialization, to an economy based on information computerization. The onset of the Information Age is associated with the Digital Revolution, just as the Industrial Revolution marked the onset of the Industrial Age.

I want to momentarily elevate a different kind of Age, the Age of Incivility. In a paradoxical kind of way, President Barack Obama’s critics frequently credit or blame, you decide which is appropriate, him for the rise of incivility in America. While I am inclined to characterize any such attributions as bovine excrement, I do see how, and in select instances why, some folks might feel that way.

Donald Trump has been the Presumptive Republican Nominee for President for several weeks now. Mr. Trump bogarted his way to the top of the heap of GOP Presidential candidates by relentlessly attacking his fellow competitors, as well as a host of others, including Mexicans and Muslims. Mr. Trump has vacillated between controversial and flat out toxic, even in his own Party.

How controversial/toxic has he been? Just yesterday, Republican Paul Ryan, Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, called Trump’s comments on (Kappa Alpha Psi Man) Judge Gonzalo Curiel “indefensible,” “wrong” and “racist.” At a news conference in the Anacostia section of Washington, DC yesterday, with a full complement of African Americans in attendance, Representative Ryan said, “Claiming that a person can’t do their job because of their race is sort of like the textbook definition of a racist comment.” Trump suggested Curiel could not adjudicate his case without bias because “He is Mexican, and I am building a wall.”   For the record, Judge Curiel was born in Indiana.

When Ryan was later asked on Fox News Radio’s Kilmeade and Friends program whether he considers Trump racist, Ryan responded:

“No, I’m not – I’m saying that the comment was. I don’t know what’s in his heart, I can’t speak to that whatsoever. What I’m saying is to suggest that a person’s race disqualifies them to do their job is textbook – that’s what I’m saying. I’m not saying what’s in his heart because I don’t know what is in his heart and I don’t think he feels that in his heart but I don’t think it is wise or justifiable to suggest that a person should be disqualified from their job because of their ethnicity.”

Despite his frustration, Ryan, who initially declined to endorse Trump said he would still vote for him. This exemplifies the challenge leaders of the GOP face. They appreciate the demographic filters associated with winning the White House. They also know, unquestionably, what it is like to lose two White House bids in a row.

I am certainly not going to say Donald Trump cannot be the next President. He does, however, continue to take actions and make statements that exasperate those in his own Party, who possibly want that high office more for him than it often looks as though he wants it for himself.

In retrospect, watching and listening to Ryan alternately prod Candidate Trump to be better, tiptoe around inconvenient truths, and dissemble with passion, all in an apparent effort to maintain a shred of credibility, I am reminded of the Biblical admonition found in Matthew 19:14, which advises, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the Kingdom of God.” (–KJV) I think of this passage, not because of Mr. Trump’s wealth, though, as he frequently reminds us, he has done very, very well in amassing a fortune, but rather due to his propensity to spew venomous uncivil statements. To close the metaphor, it appears from my vantage point, it is more difficult for a camel to traverse the eye of a needle than for Paul Ryan and the GOP Establishment to corral and manage TrumpSpeak.

Republicans leadership has spent 7 and a half years demonizing and lambasting President Obama. The level of disrespect has been so prevalent. How pervasive and disrespectful has it been? From SC Congressman Joe Wilson’s 2011 “You lie” comment, directed at the President as he addressed a joint session of Congress on various aspects of the Affordable Care Act, to then House Speaker John Boehner’s, Ohio, bypassing the President and issuing an invitation to Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu to address Congress in 2015, to Arkansas Senator Tom Cotton initiating a letter to the leaders of Iran, signed by every Republican Senator except, Lamar Alexander and Bob Corker of Tennessee, Dan Coats of Indiana, Thad Cochran of Mississippi, Susan Collins, of Maine, and Jeff Flake and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, also last year.

It is because of an innumerable list of reasons like those above that I have noted many times that Trump is effectively the anointed one; the anti-Obama, if you will. Therefore, it becomes a natural progression that the newly minted presumptive Republican Nominee takes off where his recently adopted Party left off. So yes, Obama haters can blame the President as often and as fervently as they like. Just be mindful, calling a pigeon a pimento cheese sandwich doesn’t make it be one.

Historically, we like to summon data rather than rely on “a feeling” to underscore the most vital of points. To that end, I submit two studies that suggest support for Trump is highly correlated to concerns about race and ethnicity. In one study, Hamilton College political scientist Philip Klinkner analyzed data the 2016 American National Election Study in a representative sample of 1,200 Americans to compare feelings toward Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. He evaluated the degree to which economic opinions, racial attitudes, and demographic variables predicted an individual’s feelings toward the two. His research showed one factor was much stronger than the others:

“My analysis indicates that economic status and attitudes do little to explain support for Donald Trump. Those who express more resentment toward African Americans, those who think the word ‘violent’ describes Muslims well, and those who believe President Obama is a Muslim have much more positive views of trump compared with Clinton.”

Klinkner found racial attitudes were highly determinative:

Moving from the least to the most resentful view of African Americans increases support for Trump by 44 points, those who think Obama is a Muslim (54% of all Republicans) are 24 points more favorable to Trump, and those who think the word “violent” describes Muslims extremely well are about 13 points more pro-Trump than those who think it doesn’t describe them well at all.

In the second study, the Washington Post conducted a similar analysis using data from a national poll co-sponsored by ABC News comparing Trump’s support to the other Republican primary candidates. The survey questions asked Republicans and Republican-leaning voters whether they themselves were struggling economically, and whether white people’s troubles were a direct result of “preferences for blacks and Hispanics.”

The biggest predictor of Trump support among Republicans and Republican-leaning voters was a belief that “the growing number of newcomers from other countries threatens U.S. values.” Republicans holding this belief felt 18 points more positive toward Trump on a 100-point scale, than Republicans who didn’t feel this way. Belief that Islam encourages violence, and that it’s “bad” for the country that blacks, Latinos and Asians will someday make up the majority of the population, accounted for eight-point jumps in positive feelings toward Trump. In summary, it’s about to go down. It’s up to you to fight, and especially vote to change this dynamic if you believe it’s inappropriate. For the time being, what we all face is…”No Middle Ground: Welcome to the Age of Incivility!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2016/06/06/racial-anxiety-is-a-huge-driver-of-support-for-donald-trump-two-new-studies-find/

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/politics/hillary-clinton-democratic-nomination/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/07/opinions/the-race-hillary-clinton-has-already-won-ellen-fitzpatrick/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Democratic_National_Convention

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debbie_Wasserman_Schultz

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/11/12/how-jackie-kennedy-invented-the-camelot-legend-after-jfk-s-death.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodernism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_Era

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilded_Age

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_Era

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_Age

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_time_periods#The_Americas

http://www.caller.com/opinion/letters-to-editor/letter-obama-launched-age-of-incivility-2961d284-4060-3ac4-e053-0100007fea04-365469371.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Ryan

https://mic.com/articles/145522/paul-ryan-blasts-donald-trump-s-racist-attacks-on-judge-but-stands-by-endorsement#.xD8mNInRJ

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_National_Committee

 

Memorial Day: What Your Teacher Never Told You!

It’s time to Break It Down!

(Please enjoy this reprised/updated edition of “Break It Down!” This post was originally published May 30, 2012 at: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com)

OK, so Memorial Day was earlier this week. You may be familiar with my holiday week philosophy, which is: make it easy on the readers, who are always otherwise engaged, no matter the holiday. Of course, in the process, I am also giving myself a break. That makes for a natural win-win scenario.

With that overarching thought in mind, I will endeavor to apply three elementary rules of effective communication:

  • Utilize the KISS PrincipleAKAKeep It Short & Simple (also Keep It Simple Stupid)
  • Convey new or “not widely circulated” information
  • Always remember to emphasize points 1 and 2 above

Memorial Day is a federal holiday, observed the last Monday in May, to honor America’s fallen soldiers. It originated after the Civil War. Falling between Easter and Independence Day, it is often equated with a late spring break, or a pre-summer respite. In fact, many consider it the unofficial first weekend of summer, contrasted with the Labor Day Holiday Weekend, which for many signals the unofficial end of summer.

The holiday weekend typically includes a cornucopia of sports. For example Memorial Day 2016 weekend’s events included matches from the  French Open, the NASCAR Coca-Cola 600, a Game 7 in the NBA Conference FinalsCollege Men’s Baseball playoffs, College Women’s Softball competition, and Championships in Men’s and Women’s Collegiate Lacrosse, coincidentally, both won by teams from the University of North Carolina, among other sports.

With the rapidly heating-up political season thrown in the mix, the holiday is sometimes almost lost in the shuffle, especially this year with Donald Trump totally reinventing the GOP Presidential race, and Bernie Sanders fashioning his own brand of revolution in the Democratic Party’s race. But wait; Memorial Day also has a special cultural significance. In fact, it is because of that nexus we should pay special homage to this late spring holiday.

The first well-known observance of a Memorial Day type was held May 1, 1865 in Charleston, South Carolina. Over 250 Union soldiers that had been prisoners of war, died in Charleston, and were quickly buried in makeshift graves. A group of blacks, mostly freedmen, organized the observance and led cleanup and landscaping of the burial site.

Most of the nearly 10,000 people who attended were freedmen and their families. Of that number, 3.000 were children, newly enrolled in freedman’s schools. Mutual aid societies, black ministers, and white Northern missionaries were also in attendance.

David W. BlightProfessor of American History at Yale University, and Director of the school’s Gilder-Lehrman Center for the Study of Slavery, Resistance, & Abolition, described the day this way:

“This was the first Memorial Day. African Americans invented Memorial Day in Charleston, South Carolina. What you have there is black Americans recently freed from slavery announcing to the world with their flowers, their feet, and their songs what the War had been about. What they basically were creating was the Independence Day of a Second American Revolution.”

Professor Blight conceded there is no evidence that the Charleston event led directly to the establishment of Memorial Day across the country. But the record is clear they formed the earliest truly large-scale event, complete with media coverage. Their effort was the prototype, if not the catalyst.

Having said that, I believe I honored the rules established above for this post:

  • Told this story in a direct and uncomplicated fashion
  • Presented information I am confident most readers did not know
  • Recognized points 1and 2, were accomplished and closed the post

Enjoy your bonus time, and be sure to reflect on “Memorial Day: What Your Teachers Never Told You!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkshttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com.

A new post is published each Wednesday. For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Memorial_Day

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_W._Blight

http://www.davidwblight.com/

http://www.snopes.com/military/memorialday.asp

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/25/1301862/-Memorial-Day-Has-African-American-Roots-First-One-Was-Conducted-By-Former-Slaves#

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/KISS_principle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Civil_War

http://www.yale.edu/glc/index.htm

http://www.civilwarhome.com/freedmen.htm

Everest: The Highest Gamble

It’s time to Break It Down!

Francis Bacon was the 1st Viscount of St. Alban, an English philosopher, statesman, scientist, jurist, orator, and author. He served as Attorney General and as Lord Chancellor of England. In 1625 he publish his third book of essays, entitled, Essayes or Counsels, Civill and Morall. In Chapter 12 of this edition, Bacon framed an aphorism, a version of which is still used today:

If the hill will not come to Mahomet, Mahomet will go to the hill.”

Today, the related phraseology we hear most often is, “If the mountain won’t come to Muhammad then Muhammad must go to the mountain.” When Francis Bacon coined the phrase, the first recorded instance of its use, he set it in context.

“Mahomet made the people believe that he would call a hill to him, and from the top of it offer up his prayers, for the observers of his law. The people assembled; Mahomet called the hill to come to him, again and again; and when the hill stood still, he was never a whit abashed.

Instead of being befuddled, perturbed, or embarrassed, without missing a beat, Mahomet pivoted, and uttered the phrase referenced above…

If the hill will not come to Mahomet, Mahomet will go to the hill.”

Bacon, called the father of empiricism, was popular both during life, and after his death. He considered his Essays mere recreations of his other studies, though his contemporaries yielded them critical acclaim. In fact, one 19th century literary historian, Henry Hallam, wrote of them:

“They are deeper and more discriminating than any earlier, or almost any later, work in the English language.

The Essays were translated into French and Italian during his lifetime. The 1999 edition of The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations includes no fewer than 91 quotations from his various Essays. That’s more than an adequate set up for Sir Francis Bacon.

Today’s real conversation does pertain to a mountain, and of course to one of the aphorisms popularized by Bacon, but obviously not directly to him. Instead this is a discourse about Mt. Everest and the array of individuals who have been, and who may be in the future, drawn to scale it…or to attempt to do so.

Everest is located in the Mahalangur Himal section of the Himalayas, which is in northeast Nepal and south-central Tibet (China) extending east from the pass Nangpa La between Rolwaling Himal and Cho Oyu, to the Arun River. It is the tallest peak in the world, and has been measured at 8,848 metres (29,029 ft) above sea level. The current official height as recognized by China and Nepal was established by a 1955 Indian survey and later revalidated by a Chinese survey in 1975. In 1865, Everest was given its official English name by the Royal Geographical Society upon a recommendation by Andrew Waugh, the British Surveyor General of India. Waugh chose the name in honor of his predecessor, Sir George Everest, disregarding Everest’s objections.

As the tallest mountain in the World, Everest is like a video game character festooned with a target on its back, or as the dynamic Janet Jackson put it in her Standard, That’s The Way Love Goes, “Like a moth to a flame.” And, just like that moth, too often, the result will be tragic. The next line is the song is “Burned by the fire.” On the positive side roughly 5,000 people from all around the world have successfully reached the summit of Mt. Everest. However, by the end of the 2014 climbing season at least 265 people died trying to reach the summit, and/or just as important, descend.

Avalanches alone have killed 35 people in the last two years, including 16 in one day in 2014. At least one person has died trying to climb Everest every year since 1900. Now, the 2016 count of individuals who did not survive their effort to climb Everest commences. At least four people have died on the mountain since last Thursday.

In the words of geographer and climber Jon Kedrowski, who successfully reached the summit in 2012, “Everest is a mountain of extremes. At altitude, the body deteriorates on a certain level.” In 2012, the year Kedrowski reached the summit, 10 climbers died. April 2016 was the first month of climbing since all ascent was stopped after a catastrophic earthquake that struck Nepal in 2015 and the avalanche that killed 16 Sherpas in one day in 2014.

The four deaths over the past week have rattled climbers who are just starting their descent as the climbing season comes to an end. April and May are the months most attempts are made due to there typically being less wind. Wind or not, the temperature is always a factor, ranging from -31 to -4 degrees Fahrenheit.

And yet, the climbers just keep coming. Over 400 individuals challenged Everest during this season. According to the director of Nepal’s National Tourism Department, Sudarshan Dhakal, the total included 288 foreigners and over 100 Sherpas and guides. That is more than the average of previous seasons. The two-year hiatus undoubtedly created an element of pent up demand for the experience. As a result of the weather related interruptions, 2016 was the first time in two years any one reached Everest’s summit.

On four consecutive fateful days, beginning last Thursday, “Like a moth to a flame,” four brave souls were “Burned by the fire” of Everest. May their souls rest in eternal power and peace! In their honor, see a summary of their individual stories below:

Thursday:

Phurba Sherpa – An Everest crew member, Phurba fell to his death. He was 25-years old and had been working to fix a route near the summit when he fell. The Sherpa people are an ethnic group from Nepal who have lived in the high altitudes of the Himalayas for many generations. They serve as guides and their local familiarity and experience has been invaluable, especially for foreigners trying to climb Everest.

Friday:

Eric Arnold – A 36 year-old from the Netherlands, he died at night while heading back down after succeeding in reaching the summit on Everest. It is believed he had a heart attack. Eric was a triathlete. While the cause of his heart attack has not been determined, one of the key steps in preparing for an Everest trek is to consult a physician for a full evaluation and screening to detect any pre-existing conditions. When high altitude is the goal, cardio, rather than strength, is the emphasis.

Saturday:

Maria Strydom – A 34 year-old Australian woman, Maria began suffering from altitude sickness. She reached Camp IV, the final camp before the summit. She was unable to climb any higher and a rescue attempt failed to reach her. She had a high altitude cough and acute mountain sickness, which can mean headaches and shortness of breath. These are common symptoms among Everest climbers. Maria had aspired to climb the tallest peaks on all seven continents. Before taking on Everest, she had climbed Denali in Alaska, Aconcagua in Argentina, Mount Ararat in Eastern Turkey, and Kilimanjaro in Africa. A finance professor at Monash Business School in Australia, she died before she could descend to Camp III.

Sunday:

Subash Paul – A 44 year-old, died of altitude sickness. He was part of a team of four Indian climbers and four Sherpas. The team also had two other members go missing Saturday night. It is believed that the weather deteriorated suddenly and resulted in the team losing direction. According to Nepalese officials, a helicopter search was not possible because the climbers were too high up the mountain.

Of the four casualties noted above, three died chasing a dream; the fourth fell to his death helping them. All four were in effect, “Like a moth to a flame…Burned by the fire.” Rescue efforts are still underway for two missing climbers. The death toll presents a chilling reminder of the enormous hazards Everest poses, even for the most experienced of climbers.

As moths are innately drawn to the light of the flame, we humans, as a species, are drawn to the challenge, thrill, and exhilaration defined by our individual beings. For some, it is Everest. I for one surely can’t even begin to explain it, but that’s a moot point. Those who feel the yearning do what they must. Some folks go to Vegas, and role the dice. Mountain climbers of the highest order go to Nepal and Tibet where they challenge Everest: The Highest Gamble!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com.

Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/05/24/world/everest-asia-deaths-climbing/index.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Everest

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahalangur_Himal

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Himalayas

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Bacon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essays_(Francis_Bacon)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Hallam

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/if_the_mountain_won%27t_come_to_Muhammad

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/j/janet+jackson/thats+the+way+love+goes_20069583.html

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/05/22/asia/everest-climbing-deaths/