Chicago Has Spoken: Lori Lightfoot Wins Historic Runoff

It’s time to Break It Down!

Yesterday beckoned a new day in the City of Chicago, the nation’s third most populous city. In a Mayoral Election in which the outcome, no matter which way it went, was certain to usher in a change of historic proportion, voters in the Windy City doubled down on change in the City’s historic runoff Tuesday. Both Toni Preckwinkle and Lori Lightfoot are African American women. Lightfoot, 56, who won, is a former US attorney who describes herself as “an out and proud black lesbian.” When sworn in, she will own the distinction of being both the first black woman, and the first lesbian to be Chicago’s Mayor. She will be the second woman to hold the position. Jane Byrne served one term in the capacity from 1979 to 1983.

In February’s general election, which featured 14 candidates, Lightfoot and Preckwinkle were the top two vote-getters, which led to Tuesday’s runoff. On the heels of the election, both women issued statements indicating intent to work harmoniously to build a better Chi-town. For her part, Mayor-elect Lightfoot said, “Now that it’s over I know we will work together for the city that we both love.”

Ms. Preckwinkle, 72, and a longtime political insider, heads the Cook County Board and chairs the County’s Democratic Party. She vowed to continue working on issues important to her. After calling Lightfoot to congratulate her on being victorious, she said, “This may not be the outcome we wanted but while I may be disappointed, I’m not disheartened. During the mayoral race she made education and a $15 minimum wage the major planks of her campaign.

By contrast, Lightfoot rose to prominence in the wake of the Laquan McDonald scandal — in which a white police officer, Jason Van Dyke, shot the black teenager 16 times as he walked away from police — Lightfoot was appointed by then Mayor Rahm Emanuel to head the newly created police accountability task force. Emanuel did not seek a third term. Congratulations Mayor Lightfoot. Chicago Has Spoken: Lori Lightfoot Wins Historic Runoff!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

Trump Takes Aim At Obamacare…And At Obama’s Legacy!

It’s time to Break It Down!

Just when Donald Trump appeared to be in a position to gloat (and he did) about Attorney General Barr’s determination that findings of the Mueller Report revealed no collusion, Mr. Trump had his Justice Department advise a federal appeals court of his new position that the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) should be invalidated, in its entirety. At times in the past, the administration has argued that the law’s protections for people with pre-existing conditions should be struck down, but that remaining elements of the law, including the expansion of Medicaid, should survive.

If the Appeals Court accepts the Trump administration’s new arguments, it is likely millions of people will lose health insurance, including those who gained coverage through the expansion of Medicaid and those who have private coverage subsidized by the federal government. As Abbe Gluck, a Yale law professor, framed it, “The Justice Department is no longer asking for partial invalidation of the Affordable Care Act, but says the whole law should be struck down. Not just some of the insurance provisions, but all of it, including the Medicaid expansion and hundreds of other reforms. That’s a total bombshell, which could have dire consequences on millions of people.”

Such action also makes it inexorable that a highly vigorous political furor will ensue as both Parties square off for the impending 2020 elections. Democrats have contended for some time that Trump still wants to abolish the law. At the very least, this move stands as Exhibit A.

The retail politics of this new posture will play out over time, most likely beginning with the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans. Given the pitched fight most observers anticipate, there is a good chance the ultimate decision will wind up in the Supreme Court. President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law nine years ago. Since then it has become insinuated into our nation’s health care system. Because of it, Medicare pays doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers in different ways than it did prior to the inception of the law. It has unleashed a plethora of innovations in health care delivery. In response, the health insurance industry has invented a new business model selling coverage to all comers, regardless of pre-existing conditions.

Trump’s new position has engendered a bevy of harsh criticism by both the insurance industry and by consumer advocates, including the following:

  • Matt Eyles, president and chief executive of America’s Health Insurance Plans, said, “The government’s position puts coverage at risk for more than 100 million Americans.”
  • Leslie Dach, chairman of Protect Our Care, a consumer advocacy group, added, “In November, voters overwhelmingly rejected President Trump’s health care repeal and sabotage agenda. But he remains dead set on accomplishing through the courts what he and his allies in Congress could not do legislatively: fully repeal the law, devastate American health care and leave millions of Americans at risk.”
  • Xavier Becerra, attorney general of California, asserted Monday while filing a brief urging the appeals court to uphold the law, “The Texas lawsuit (the ruling upon which the administration’s new posture is predicated) is as dangerous as it is reckless.”

On one hand, reneging on a promise to retain the pre-existing conditions provision of the law, made by Trump, and the GOP at-large, may seem odd. Not really, on Trump’s part. When you consider Trump’s Number 1 trigger, Barack Obama, it all falls into place. It has always been clear there is nothing along the political spectrum that drives Trump more than his need to diminish and, if he has his way, abolish Obama’s legacy. Destroying the Affordable Care Act, Obama’s signature program, is Job 1. Think back to Senator McCain’s infamous “thumbs down,” torpedoing Trump and the GOP’s effort to repeal and replace Obamacare. Trump is still livid about that, and has recently trashed McCain, months after the Senator’s death due to brain cancer, because of the snub.

Yes, the Affordable Care Act is on the clock. But that’s not all. Trump Takes Aim At Obamacare…And At Obama’s Legacy!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

Trump Through The Eyes Of A Supporter: Things You Need To Know

It’s time to Break It Down!

Happy Vernal Equinox! Last week the ACC Tournament was in full swing. This week, the NCAA Tourney commences. Another week, another Tournament; this one lasts the better part of three weeks. GO HEELS! OK, OK, the NIT also kicks off this week.

Now that I got that out of the way, permit me to introduce you to a story I’ve been trying to tell for more than two years, but today, I do so from the perspective of a true believer, instead of my cynical self. In short, I have been arguing since 45’s election that his supporters are there for the long haul, and the factors that allowed him to succeed in 2016, can, and may, for all practical purposes, replicate themselves in 2020. Oh yeah, and rest assured, he’ll be in play in 2020. No investigative report is going to prevent that.

Victor Davis Hanson wrote an opinion piece that was published yesterday on Hanson is a Stanford Ph. D., professor emeritus of Classics at California State University, Fresno, and currently a Senior Fellow in classics and military history at Stanford University‘s Hoover Institution. His other pursuits include farmer and columnist. It is, of course, in this latter capacity in which Dr. Hanson was operating when he penned the subject column that appeared under the heading, “What progressives should know about Trump voters.”

Hanson is a conservative and a Trump booster who has also written a pro-Trump tome, published this year, entitled, “A Case for Trump. ”Predictably, Mr. Trump praised the book. In his book, Dr. Hanson defends Trump’s insults and vile language as “uncouth authenticity”, and praises Trump for “an uncanny ability to troll and create hysteria among his media and political critics.

One unimpressed detractor, Washington Post book critic Carlos Lozada, noted the book “focuses less on the case for Trump than on the case against everyone else,” in particular attacking Hillary Clinton. As a Trump supporter, it comes as no surprise that Hanson was an Obama critic. But I digress.

In yesterday’s opinion, Hanson enumerated 10 points adopted by consensus and uniformly endorsed by all who view the world according to Donald Trump. The complete commentary can be viewed by clicking the first link below. Here are the 10 points in summary form:

  1. Voters appreciate the strong economy.
  2. Many Trump supporters, who dislike his antics, hate Democrats even more.
  3. Despite his being crass and uncouth, he has expressed concerns that resonate with that part of the country often referred to as flyover states
  4. While some view him as callous, his supporters see him as authentic
  5. Even when he stumbles, Trump’s supporters have established they will, in most instances, continue to stick with him.
  6. His supporters view the plethora of negative news stories about Trump as part of a sustained effort to remove or delegitimize him.
  7. What-abouitism. TrumpWorld notes that, ”while in office,” trump has not had the kind of peccadilloes that marked Kennedy’s, or Clinton’s tenure. They observe further, that while his language is blunt, so was that of Truman and LBJ.
  8. Much like #3 above, his supporters believe elites, the deep state, or the universal “they” are at once condemnatory, yet ignorant of the plight of those who reside in flyover country.
  9. All things considered, his supporters view the Trump family circle as tight and strong.
  10. To Trump supporters, his rants and rambling are as engaging as JFK, (Bill) Clinton, or Obama; definitely not flat, like Bob Dole, Mitt Romney…or (Hillary) Clinton.

To be sure, the items above are the thoughts of one individual. Yet, they reflect the Borg-like mindset of TrumpWorld. Is it possible that, even if true, there will not be enough synergy to re-create a lightening strike in the exact same spot? Do you really want to just whistle in the dark and take that chance? If you don’t have any friends, family members, or acquaintances that are Trump supporters (that you know…because I guarantee you, you have some), you should add some, or at least one, to your circle. Stay grounded my friends.

Enjoy opening week of the NCAA’s. However, in your more sober moments, think about Trump Through the Eyes of a Supporter: Things You Need to Know!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:


The Price Is Right: Mother of All College Admissions Schemes

It’s time to Break It Down!

It’s NCAA Post-Season Tournament time. That means the ACC and a host of other tournaments have or are kicking off this week. In other words, it’s virtually a holiday, at least for college basketball fans. To that end, I’m going to treat this week’s post similar to the way I do most holiday posts. Similar, but not quite the same as I usually do during holidays. In those instances, I usually re-share a previous post. Today’s post is actually breaking news, but I won’t provide much additional commentary. The story stands on its own merit (or in this case, actually, demerit).

According to CNN reporting, yesterday, federal prosecutors announced that dozens of parents, including famous actresses, college coaches and a winemaker were charged in an alleged conspiracy to get students into top colleges. Fifty people were included in the federal criminal complaint.

William “Rick” Singer, based upon details released by the feds, is alleged to have conspired with a host of others to facilitate the fraudulent acceptance of students using bogus test scores, in some cases, purporting to be sports recruits. As I read about and listened to a variety of folks discussing this scheme yesterday, I saw it compared to affirmative action and legacy admissions, both of which are legal remedies to validly identified obstacles to college admission. This…is nothing like that. Full stop!

Mr. Singer, 58 years old, is from Newport Beach, California and is the owner/operator of Edge College & Career Network, LLC, a for-profit college counseling, and preparation business. Singer also served as CEO of Key Worldwide Foundation, a nonprofit, posing as a charity. He is the mastermind behind the scam to ensure that wealthy parents living a, by any means necessary, dream could grease the skids to ensure acceptance and admission of their kids to the best, most prestigious, hardest to gain entry to colleges and universities in America.

In Singer’s own words, “I created a side door that would guarantee families would get in. I was bribing coaches for a spot. And that occurred very frequently.” The overarching scheme was multi-varied, and often effective. At its core it was basic, but brazen. The three principal facets were:

Cheat on standardized tests

Bribe decision-makers

Pretend the money was for charity

Of the 50 people charged, many were not just wealthy, but individuals of fame, prominence, and notoriety.


  • Felicity Huffman (Desperate Housewives) and her spouse made an alleged $15,000 charitable contribution to Key Worldwide Foundation to participate in the college entrance exam-cheating scheme on behalf of her oldest daughter. She later made arrangements to do so on behalf of her younger daughter, before changing her mind and deciding not to do so. She has been charged with felony conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. She was arrested at her home.
  • Lori Loughlin (“Full House” and “Fuller House”) and her husband fashion designer Mossimo Giannulli have been charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. Giannulli allegedly “agreed to pay bribes totaling $500,000” in exchange for having their two daughters designated as recruits to the USC crew team – despite the fact they did not participate in crew – thereby facilitating their admission to USC.

A Winemaker

  • Agustin Huneeus, Jr., who owns vineyards in Napa, California, and elsewhere, conspired to “bribe [senior athletic director Donna] Heinel and Jovan Vavic, the USC water polo coach, to facilitate his daughter’s admission to USC as a purported water polo recruit. He was charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud and honest services mail fraud. Heinel and Vavic are accused of conspiracy to commit racketeering.

CEO of a boutique-marketing firm

  • Agreed to make a purported contribution of $50,000 to Key Worldwide in exchange for having a cooperating witness take the ACT on behalf of her son at a Houston test center.

New York International Law Firm Attorney

  • This parent paid a purported $75,000 to Key Worldwide. A cooperating witness arranged for the director of college entrance exam preparation at a private school in Bradenton, Florida to pretend to proctor the attorney’s daughter’s ACT exam and “correct the answers after she completed it.”

College coaches and administrators (CNN has reached out to all four schools listed below)

  • Yale University – Former Head Coach Women’s Soccer
  • Stanford University
  • University of Southern California – Senior Associate Athletic Director, former Assistant Women’s Soccer Coach
  • Wake Forest University

This is truly only a CliffNotes kind of summary of this outrageous scandal. To find more details about this scam, check in with your favorite media outlet. It’s bound to be a part of the news cycle for at least the next few days. The involvement of Hollywood celebrities alone will ensure TV coverage, and print and electronic media are almost certain to go along for the ride. So, check it out. The Price Is Right: Mother of All College Admissions Schemes!”

P.S. By all means, consider that while this repugnant and scandalous scheme was foiled, it is likely it represents just the tip of the iceberg, and many more scams of its ilk remain active, but unseen.

Now, that we got that out of the way, let’s get back to basketball. GO HEELS!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

Majority of Americans Think Trump has Committed Crimes: It Gets Worse

It’s time to Break It Down!

There is an old and familiar saying; “Truth is stranger than fiction.” In contemporary America, this has never been truer. In fact, at the highest levels of our national government, there is a prima facie case to be made that this golden platitude is the current day rule rather than the exception.

As I’ve noted previously, there are times when the gist of a story has already been presented, and just doesn’t need re-visioning or embellishing. This particular news item is about as straight forward as it gets. A recent Quinnipiac University poll found that nearly two-thirds (64%) of respondents think Trump has committed crimes…before taking office. Let that sink in. And let’s be clear. That is not 64% of Democrats, or of independents, but 64% of “all” respondents.

There’s more (the “it gets worse” part). The poll found that 65% of all respondents believe Trump is not honest. Moreover, it’s worth keeping in mind that since the end of 2017, the low end of the spectrum of Americans who feel that way was 57%. In other words, a majority of Americans have believed this about Trump, for more than a year, and the number has grown.

It’s fair to say, most people think politicians are dishonest. In this light, when compared to his counterparts, he fares slightly better, but, even at that, half of respondents say he’s less honest than past presidents. Expand that picture and you’ll find only 20% of respondents – and less than half of Republicans, say he’s more honest than past presidents.


  • Over 70% of Americans, including more than 1/3 of Republicans, say Trump is not a good role model for children
  • Half of respondents said they were more likely to believe Michael Cohen, versus 35% who said they believe Donald Trump, while a plurality of Americans think Cohen told the truth in his testimony. Yes, the same Michael Cohen who pleaded guilty to lying to Congress, last year, was deemed more believable than Donald Trump.
  • A slightly larger number of respondents, 45%, think Trump has committed crimes while in office, versus 43% who believe he has not.
  • Most Americans, including a quarter of Republicans think Congress should investigate Cohen’s claims.
  • Overall, Trump’s approval rating was 38%, while 55% disapproved.

From a pro-Trump perspective, despite the mind-numbing parade of negativity represented by the preceding array of data, there was good news. The poll showed that 49% of respondents approved of Trump’s handling of the economy, and more important, I presume, 35% of respondents were in favor of initiating impeachment proceedings, while 59% oppose.

As a pragmatist, I must admit that I have a working theory about that last statistic. First and foremost, zero Republicans want Trump impeached. Obviously, that does not a majority make. However, Democrats and independents have acquired an appreciation for strategic design. They understand all too well that, were the House to indict Trump on impeachment charges, the Senate, as was the case with Bill Clinton, is all but certain to rebuff them, and opt not to convict him of any charges. This, while ostensibly a monumental waste of time, would quite possibly give an individual who was elected the first time without a majority of the popular vote, just enough wind beneath his wings to create a second lightning strike. In other words, they don’t want to chance it.

I have maintained for the entire Trump tenure that the best and foremost chance to rid the upper echelon of America’s government of its current scourge is to vote the rascals out. With that in mind, do not, I repeat, do not read the bulleted items and conclude that the work has been put in, and it’s a done deal. Trump had an unbelievable amount of baggage in 2016; today he is President. A different 2020 outcome is not a given. Do, however, remember, a “Majority of Americans Think Trump has Committed Crimes: It Gets Worse!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:


Black History Month: Chronicles of the Evolution of African American Life Redux

It’s time to Break It Down!

Nine years ago in February, 2010, I wrote a series of 4 profiles on African Americans3 of whom were little known.  While their exploits were dramatic in all four instances, they were simply fundamentally, even stunningly life altering in some cases. In 2012, I synthesized the material from those four posts into one digest, which I am reprising in edited fashion today.

We live in an age in which, despite the ubiquitous nature of the Internet and the pervasiveness of the 24-7 news cycle, the names, exploits, and accomplishments of luminaries such as Henrietta LacksCharlotte Hawkins Brown, and Alexander Manly are enmeshed in an historical nebula; present, but barely known or visible.

By contrast, speak or write the name Barack Obama, and due to a variety of factors, almost anyone you meet in the civilized world is capable of spouting off a vast array of factoids, real, imagined, true or false.  As POTUS, President Obama certainly earned all the notoriety he amassed, while the relative lack of knowledge about LacksBrown, and Manly is in no way an accurate reflection of their relative importance.  All made important contribution to life, as we know it in America; at least one altered the dynamics of medical history around the world.

Alex Manly, who was African American, was also a descendent of Charles ManlyNorth Carolina’s 31st Governor.  In 1898Wilmington held the dual distinction of being North Carolina’s largest city, and predominantly black.  Mr. Manly was the editor of the Wilmington Daily Record, the only black-owned newspaper in the United States at the time.  He wrote a controversial editorial with both racial and sexual implications.  The piece was so super-charged that it is cited as the catalyst for the infamous November 10, 1898 Wilmington race riot. The gist of Manly’s editorial comments is aptly distilled in this quote:

  • “Our experience among poor white people in the country teaches us that women of that race are not any more particular in the matter of clandestine meetings with colored men than the white men with the colored women.”

The rest is history; it took three months, but in November, after the August editorial that included that quote, Wilmington burned…and Manly and the robust black leadership class fled the city.  Manly was an example of a bold and defiant voice that emerging black leaders would demonstrate in the American South and across this country in the coming years.  The reaction of much of Wilmington’s white citizenry was equally clear, and at that juncture, more powerfully defiant.

Charlotte Hawkins Brown was a native North Carolinian who was educated in Massachusetts, and who returned to her home state to lead an all girls’ school, which she later transformed into a Junior College.

Ms. Brown made her mark fostering and improving African American achievement, especially among women.  Her considerable legacy includes:

Henrietta Lacks is not from North Carolina (she hailed from neighboring Virginia), but her story’s impact permeates not only the Tar Heel (and Old Dominion) state, and the rest of the country, but spans the entire globe.  Ms. Lacks, who lived a short life, by almost any measure, died of cervical cancer at age 31 in 1951.  Posthumously, she would go on to have an inordinate impact on cancer treatment as well as a number of other serious diseases, all over the world, through cells removed prior to her death.  The essence of her story is that:

  • Researchers at Johns Hopkins discovered a scientific breakthrough related to Ms. Lacks’ cells. In a departure from anything the scientists had seen before, the cells culled from Ms. Lacks continued to grow, outside of her body, and after her death. In fact, they did not just survive, they multiplied. In a circular irony, cells from Ms. Lacks’ culture were used to help Dr. Jonas Salk develop a vaccine for polio in 1955. Of course, Ms. Lacks had marched to help find a cure for that disease just four years earlier.

Unarguably, the Barack Obama story is one that most Americans are familiar with, at least tangentially.  President Obama, the son of a Kenyan father and a Kansan mother, was born in Hawaii, graduated from Columbia University, and Harvard University Law School, and went on to become a Chicago community organizer.  Oh yeah, on November 4, 2008, he was elected President of the United States.  As such:

One of President Obama’s historic appointments was the selection of Eric Holder as Attorney General (He also subsequently appointed Loretta Lynch, also an African American, to filled the position when General Holder stepped down to pursue other interests).  That would hold special significance this month anyway, as Mr. Holder is African American.  It has taken on an added dimension however, as Dr. Sharon MaloneMr. Holder’s wife, distinguished in her own right, shares a part of her family history in a PBS Special, in which she details how her Uncle Henry, born nearly 30 after slavery ended officially, was one of thousands of black men arrested on fabricated charges and forced into labor camps and compelled to work without pay.  As Dr. Malone tells the story, she asks you to:

  • Imagine that this “convict leasing” system saw the groups of prisoners sold to private parties – like plantation owners or corporations – and that it was not only tolerated by both the North and South, but largely ignored by the U.S. Justice Department.
  • Now, imagine that nearly a century after your uncle served 366 days in this penal labor system, you find yourself married to the head of the U.S. Justice Department, who, ironically, just so happens to be the first African American in the position.

There are many reasons why this information is not just historically significant, but contemporarily relevant.  None is more compelling than debunking the idea that the vagaries and vicissitudes of slavery and its variant offshoots no longer plague our society in general and African Americans in particular.  As Dr. Malone put it:

  • “I want people to understand that this is not something that’s divorced and separate, and this doesn’t have anything to do with them.  If you were a black person who grew up in the South, some way or the other – whether or not you were directly involved in the system as my uncle was – you knew somebody who was, or your daily lives were circumscribed by those circumstances.”

Unless you are part of Dr. Malone’s immediate family, her Uncle Henry is likely even more of an unknown to you than Alex Manly, Charlotte Hawkins Brown, and Henrietta Lacks.  Yet, his story is as irrevocably interwoven into the fabric of African American and American History as that of President Obama.  In fact, African American History is American History.  Over the month that will end tomorrow, by all means, take at least one more moment to reflect on the fact it’s not just a month, it’s every single day, 24/7/365…”Black History Month: Chronicles of the Evolution of African American Life Redux!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: A new post is published each Wednesday. For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:


Klan Needs To Ride Again: A Shot Across The Bow

It’s time to Break It Down!

Believe it or not, the clause before the colon is the title of a real opinion piece, in a functioning American newspaper, on Valentines’ Day (Just 6 days ago), near the end of the second decade of the 21stCentury, in the United States of America. You might say you’re surprised? I would ask, why? Quoth Childish Gambino (AKA Donald Glover): “This Is America!” And today…that kind of “ish” is just de rigueur.

Occasionally, I have found that a post sometimes speaks for itself. This one is definitely a candidate for that distinction. Mr. Goodloe Sutton, the owner, publisher, and editor of the Democrat-Reporter, a weekly newspaper in Linden, Alabama, wrote the aforementioned editorial. See editorial below (unedited):

“Time for the Ku Klux Klan to night ride again.”

“Democrats in the Republican Party and Democrats are plotting to raise taxes in Alabama.

They do not understand how to eliminate expenses when money is needed in other areas. This socialist-communist ideology sounds good to the ignorant, the uneducated, and the simple-minded people.

People who do not understand the constitution do not like to be responsible.

Slaves, just freed after the civil war, were not stupid. At times, they borrowed their former masters’ robes and horses and rode through the night to frighten some evil-doer (sic). Sometimes they had to kill one or two of them, but so what.

This is the same so what used when Democrats got us into World War I and World War II. Then they got us fighting in Korea. Next when the industrial Northeast wanted more money, they got us in the Vietnam War, and now into the Middle East War.

If you haven’t noticed, they did away with the draft so their sons would not have to go into battle.

Seems like the Klan would be welcomed to raid the gated communities up there. They call them compounds now. Truly, they are the ruling class.”

When asked in an interview whether he penned editorial, Mr. Sutton admitted he did and opined:

“If we could get the Klan to go up there and clean out D.C., we’d all been better off.”

When reporters at the Montgomery Advertiser asked Sutton to elaborate what he meant by”cleaning up D.C.,” Sutton suggested lynching. He said:

“We’ll get the hemp ropes out, loop them over a tall limb and hang all of them.”

The reporter then asked Sutton if he believed it was appropriate for a newspaper publisher to call for lynching Americans. At that point, he doubled down on his position. Sutton responded:

“… It’s not calling for the lynchings (sic) of Americans. These are socialists-communists we’re talking about. Do you know what socialism and communism is?”

The reporter then asked Sutton if he recognized the KKK as a racist and violent organization? Sutton disagreed. He expounded:

“The Klan is like the NAACP. As for a violent organization, well, they didn’t kill but a few people. The Klan wasn’t violent until it needed to be.”

After learning of Sutton’s most recent editorial, and related and clarifying comments, the School of Communications at his alma mater, the University of Southern Mississippi, removed him from its Hall of Fame. The School released an accompanying statement:

“Within the last few hours, the School of Communication at the University of Southern Mississippi learned of Mr. Goodloe Sutton’s call for violence and the return of the Ku Klux Klan. Mr. Sutton’s subsequent rebuttals and attempts at clarification only reaffirm the misguided and dangerous nature of his comments. The School of Communication strongly condemns Mr. Sutton’s remarks, as they are antithetical to all that we value as scholars of journalism, the media, and human communication. Our University’s values of social responsibility and citizenship, inclusion and diversity, and integrity and civility are the foundation upon which we have built our School and its programs.”

Yes, this particular newspaper and its owner, publisher, editor are located in a small town in the Deep South. But don’t get it twisted. The views expressed by this individual are consistent with ideas widely shared on social media, and often in person, everyday by countless individuals across this country. One can hear similar opinions emanate from other outposts of the Fourth Estate, from the highest levels of government, from inside the spired towers of religion, and if the miscellany of fortune dictates, from the guy or gal next door. Remember where you heard it first thoughKlan Needs to Ride Again: A Shot Across the Bow!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.comFind a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribeclick on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.” Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post: