It’s 2014: Is Your Right to Vote Secure?

Nearly eight months ago, I wrote about a series of coordinated, pernicious attacks on voting rights in North Carolina. As we approach the end of the first quarter of this year, Election Day 2014 is just over seven months away. Obviously, Primaries are even closer.

In June 2013, the Supreme Court’s decision in Shelby County v. Holder effectively nullified Section 5, a key provision of the Voting Rights Act by striking down Section 4.  In July, the North Carolina State Legislature passed an omnibus bill (HB 589) that many consider the signature voter suppression law in the country.

In my July 31, 2013 Blog, I discussed a number of measures enacted in the Old North State that will curtail access to executing the voting franchise by many North Carolinians. In that post I noted, “The North Carolina General Assembly approved a Voter ID law on steroids.  The House approved a bill in April that required Voter IDThe Senate then, in the closing days of the session, added 40 pages and over 50 provisions.”

The law not only requires voters to provide a government ID in order to execute their ballot; in addition to disenfranchising 319,000 voters who do not have such an ID (Driver’s License, State ID, Military ID, and U.S. Passport), the bill also:

Ends same day registration

Rescinds automatic restoration of voting rights to ex-felons

Legalizes the right for any person to stand in a polling place and issue a challenge to ones right to vote

Eliminates straight ticket voting

Abolishes pre-registration by 17 year-olds

Reduces Early Voting from 17 days to 10 days

Requires voters to make all address updates or other changes at least 25 days prior to Election Day

Weakens disclosure requirements intended to make clear who underwrites campaign ads

Permits political parties to raise unlimited corporate donations

Raises the cap on individual donations from $4,000 to $5,000

Supporters of the measure insist the new law will “restore faith in elections, and prevent voter fraud, which they say is endemic and undetected (a patently contradictory assertion).  Republican partisans make this claim, despite the fact the State Board of Elections there has been one (only one) case of voter fraud identified since 2012.

Conversely, opponents of the law, including nonpartisan voting rights groups, Democrats, and Libertarians contend the true goal of the initiative is to suppress voter turnout among young, old, poor, and minority voters.  More than 300,000 North Carolina voters do not possess the requisite ID; most are students, the elderly, the poor, or black. It does not the keenest of observers to recognize President Obama won all those voting blocs except the elderly in both 2008 and 2012.  Further, according to North Carolina voting statistics, Democrats are more likely to vote early, and more prone to vote straight ticket.

It is totally fair and appropriate to concede that North Carolina is by no means alone in passing measures similar to this law.  In fact most Southern states have instituted such laws in the past year. However, as a proud North Carolinian, born and bred, I do take personal exception to this abridgement of rights. Fortunately, my position is not unique.

The National Commission on Voting Rights (NCVR) is holding a series of hearings across the country to consider acts of voting discrimination and various other election challenges. The NCVR is entity that evolved from the National Commission on the Voting Rights Act.  The new group will hold the tenth of its hearings in Rocky Mount, NC on March 28, 2014.  This hearing is organized by a coalition of voting rights and civil rights groups, including:

  • The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
  • NC NAACP
  • ACLU of North Carolina
  • UNC Center for Civil Rights
  • Southern Coalition for Social Justice
  • Advancement Project
  • Democracy North Carolina

At the hearing, a panel will take testimony on a number of topics that include:

  • Barriers to access for individuals with disabilities
  • African American & Latino voters
  • The impact of new voting rules on students
  • Needs of rural voters
  • Impact of State laws on rural Counties in the State

If you believe this issue is important, and/or if you know others who believe it is an essential undertaking, and you are a North Carolinian, I encourage you to consider attending the NCVR Hearing.  See pertinent details below:

WHAT: National Commission on Voting Rights, North Carolina Hearing

Panels – There will be formal panels of witnesses representing voting rights organizations, community leaders, election officials, and other stakeholders. Witnesses are encouraged to submit written testimony in advance of the hearing. The panel of commissioners will also receive the testimony orally and may ask follow up questions.


Open Public Testimony – There will several open public testimony periods for voters to testify about their experiences.

WHEN:  Friday, March 28, 2014, 9:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m.

WHERE: OIC of Rocky Mount, 402 East Virginia St., Rocky Mount, NC 27802

How You Can Get Involved!

  • Share your voting experience and/or tell us about voting changes in your community: http://aftershelby.lawyerscommittee.org
  • Attend a hearing (details below)
  • Call the 1-866-OUR-VOTE Hotline to report voting changes in your community

“It’s 2014: Is Your Right to Vote Secure?” I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/2013/07/31/nc-voter-id-law-taking-our-country-back/

http://signup.lawyerscommittee.org/p/salsa/event/common/public/?event_KEY=423086

http://www.lawyerscommittee.org/projects/voting_rights/page?id=0144

http://www.advancementproject.org/resources/entry/statement-of-katie-oconnor-to-north-carolina-house-elections-committee

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10694048

http://arcnc.org/file/2013/NCVR.pdf

https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/9744-voters-speak-out-ncvr?locale=en

http://citizenjames72.blogspot.com/2014/03/national-commission-on-voting-rights.html

http://www.protectcivilrights.org/pdf/voting/NorthCarolinaVRA.pdf

http://www.thenation.com/blog/177577/north-carolina-shows-why-voting-rights-act-still-needed#

When No News Is All The News You Have!

Malaysia Airlines Flight 370, which disappeared in the early morning hours of March 8, after takeoff from Kuala Lumpur en route to Beijing, has been the source of many questions and very few answers.  At least 26 countries are or have been in search of the Boeing 777 airliner and it’s 239 passengers and crew for the past 11 days, and counting.  As news stories go, this one has captivated the focus of multiple news outlets.  In fact, for at least one cable outlet, it has been elevated to virtually 24/7 status.

I understand that an Airline finding itself with a missing aircraft, 239 missing passengers, and a missing crew, is a huge deal.  That the passengers and crew have been missing for nigh on two weeks makes for unfathomable tension, frustration, fear, and a host of other emotions for families and friends.  Yet, I am stunned by the ability of agencies, which purport to report the news, to continue to conceive new and more creative ways to say I/we don’t know what happened to the plane, the passengers, or the crew, but…here, dear viewer, is our newest unsubstantiated theory.

In no small way, this phenomenon appears to take a potential tragedy, and leverage from it, every available ounce of emotional capital.  That the practice has led to a ratings bonanza makes it completely understandable, in an, “it’s just a calculated business decision” kind of way.  Yet, for an industry that was once relied upon to report the news, rather than gin up, and spread conjecture, it should be equally understood that the decision to operate in this way fundamentally changes the dynamic of what heretofore was called the news cycle, and not in a good way.  This epic spate of “reporting” may not represent the all time nadir of on air news, but it the current sequence continues uninterrupted much longer the question must at least be debated.

We live in the age of connectivity; a time in which transcontinental travel is routine, and in which communication is both constant and omnipresent.  We are accustomed to using Global Positioning Systems (familiarly known as GPS) to track our movements via mobile phones, automobiles, trains, and even airplanes.  Consequently, when our 12st Century advanced technology is stumped, we, understandably, are at a real loss.  Unfortunately, this is exactly the case in which we find ourselves, as we attempt to unravel the “Mystery of (the missing) Flight 370.

I will not submit to the temptation to add to the litany of theories that abound about what might have happened, what could not have happened, what did not happen, nor what will happen next, as it relates to Flight 370.  Instead, I will simply implore anyone who will listen to consider responding with a concise and earnest reply, no comment, to any question posed, “When No News Is All the News You Have!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/18/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/18/malaysia-scenarios/6559209/

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/malaysia-airlines-flight-370-probe-digs-into-past-of-all-on-board-missing-boeing-777/

http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/nation/2014/03/18/mh370-leading-theories/6576271/

http://www.cbsnews.com/videos/eye-opener-the-mystery-of-flight-370-takes-another-turn/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/17/world/asia/malaysia-plane-up-to-speed/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/17/world/asia/malaysia-airlines-plane-fascination/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/lost-the-mysterious-baffling-disappearance-of-malaysia-flight-370/2014/03/11/1b7e390e-a94f-11e3-b61e-8051b8b52d06_story.html

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2014/03/sunday-on-this-week-the-mystery-of-flight-370/

http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/17/flight-370-mystery-investigators-believe-co-pilot-spoke-last-words-reportedly-probe-plane

Weeding Out…The Inaccuracies!

I cannot say that I am shocked, not even surprised.  Nearly a decade and a half into the 21st Century, that an established major Party elected politician might not only tweet, but also defend these comments:

• “Let’s be honest, 70% of teams in NBA could fold tomorrow + nobody would notice a difference w/ possible exception of increase in streetcrime.”

Sadly, such mischaracterizations have become par for the course.  In recent years, a flurry of politicos have bolstered their conservative bona fides and political cred by uttering biting, if not bigoted and spiteful remarks targeted at or based upon someone’s ethnic group, sexual preference, or gender designation.  Suffice it so say, the NBA is an easy target for such ad hominem attacks.  The League’s employees are all male, and the vast majority of them are black.  Oh yes, by even the most generous of standards they are wealthy.  So, who would possibly fell compelled to rally in their defense?  Well, if the attack is an open rant on Twitter, almost anyone might respond.

Pat Garofalo is a Minnesotan, an elected politician (Minnesota House of Representatives), a member of the Republican Party, and a member of the Twitterverse.  At 7:33 p.m. Central Time (Minnesota) this past Sunday evening, Mr. Garofalo tweeted the bulleted comment above.

The tweet resonated; it was re-tweeted hundreds of times within a two-hour period.  A number of folks on Twitter called the comment racist.  Undaunted by the push back and possibly buttressed by individuals who co-signed and or supported the remarks, Mr. Garofalo defended them.

He said he was:

• “Talking about the NBA’s high arrest rate and that they are the only major pro league that testing positive for marijuana is not a substance abuse violation.”

If that is what you want to believe, it may sound good.  Sound good, or not, it is an inaccurate assertion.  The truth is the NBA’s arrest rate is below the national average. Moreover, the evil pot meme is melting away like the winter’s snow throughout the Southeast.  Marijuana is a legalized substance in two states, is widely available for medical use in another 18 states, and is a minor offense in most states.

It took a while, but the facts actually finally made their way to the Mr. Garofalo.  Subsequently, he apologized for the tweet on Monday.

He said in a statement:

• “I was under the mistaken impression that the National Basketball Association did not test for marijuana. In fact, that is false…That is a drug policy violation and something that’s clearly stated in their collective bargaining agreement.”

You can read the NBA’s anti-drug policy, which specifically mentions marijuana, here.

In summary, this was a story with a happy-ending.  In the span of just one day, an ill-conceived remark was tweeted, vetted, and rescinded.  This was a great example of “Weeding Out…The Inaccuracies!”  If only it were always that simple, and quick.

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pat_Garofalo

https://twitter.com/PatGarofalo/status/442805513697628160

http://extramustard.si.com/category/sign-of-the-apocalypse/

http://www.startribune.com/politics/statelocal/249218011.html

http://www.scribd.com/doc/211699556/Anti-Drug-Agreement-Summary-2013-14

http://www.suntimes.com/sports/26112786-419/minnesota-rep-pat-garofalo-apologizes-for-offensive-nba-tweet.html

http://www.foxnews.com/sports/2014/03/10/minnesota-rep-pat-garofalo-nba-tweet-called-racist-prompts-hundreds-responses/

http://www.latimes.com/sports/sportsnow/la-sp-sn-pat-garofalo-nba-20140310,0,2576680.story#axzz2viHdTNsD

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/03/10/state-rep-pat-garofalo-says-nba-players-are-criminals.html

http://www.twincities.com/breakingnews/ci_25309842/state-rep-pat-garofalos-tweet-about-nba-draws

A Negotiated Settlement: Win-Win for the CIAA and Charlotte-Mecklenburg

There is no place like home.  Hence, every now and then, despite all the national and international news that dominates the airways, occasionally, I am compelled to write about something with a local flavor.

For months leading up to last week’s famed CIAA Tournament, scuttlebutt ran rampant that the Conference was disillusioned with the City, and was on the verge of kicking the Queen City to the curb.  Rumors of Atlanta, Raleigh, Winston-Salem, Washington, DC, and even New York City made the rounds.

The CIAA, formally known as the Central Intercollegiate Athletic Association, is the nation’s oldest African-American athletic conference, established in 1912 on the campus of Hampton University.  The conference currently includes twelve teams, six each in the Northern and Southern Divisions.  Johnson C. Smith University, located in Charlotte, is the official host team, as long as the Tournament remains in Charlotte.

The Tournament moved to Charlotte in 2006 and ended a nine-year run last week.  Ms. Jacqui Carpenter, Commissioner of the League, indicated the Conference would seek/accept bids from interested cities for Tournaments beginning in 2015.  The move fueled a wildfire of speculation.

Alas, on the day after the Tourney concluded, Commissioner Carpenter and Charlotte Mayor Patrick Cannon announced the Conference and the City brokered a negotiated settlement, and reached an agreement that would bring the venerable Tournament to Charlotte for six more years (through 2020).  Moreover, the CIAA announced it would relocate its headquarters from Hampton, VA to Charlotte.  Mayor Cannon alluded to the sequence of events as a “buzzer-beater victory” for Charlotte-Mecklenburg.

A good friend of mine, who is a local attorney and former elected official, wrote a compelling case for our local governments supporting acting to retain the CIAA Tournament as an annual event in our community.  Without recounting his entire opinion, I will cover the major points below:

• The City & County jointly invested $400,000 to fund CIAA scholarships in 2013

• CIAA fans spent $47 million on hotel rooms, restaurant meals, game tickets, and related parties during the 4-5 days of the Tournament (Largest Annual Tourism event in the City)

• Mecklenburg County collected $2.5 million in sales tax revenue for that period (which does not include non-sales tax revenue collected by restaurants, hotels, night club owners, transportations services, private caters, radio stations, private police and security services, retail outlets and other vendors and service providers

• The $400,000 annual City-County investment yields a return many times over in sales tax revenue; more than 6 times the amount invested

• In addition, the event generated approximately $950,000 in State sales tax revenue.

My friend brought his case to the public square, in response to criticism of the City and County for allocating public funds to the CIAA.  He even noted that some have argued that supporting the Tournament negatively affects public education.

He went on to say such an argument fails to take into account the robust return on “our” public investment.  He concludes, the reality is, our local community is fortunate that the CIAA, ACC (Football & Basketball), NCAA, AAU, and a host of other tournaments, conferences, and conventions are insightful, and perceptive enough to select our community to host their events.

Suffice it to say, I fully support his assessment, and agree wholeheartedly with his conclusion.  In the grand scheme of things, it was “A Negotiated Settlement: Win-Win for the CIAA and Charlotte-Mecklenburg!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Intercollegiate_Athletic_Association

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/03/03/4738312/ciaa-to-stay-in-charlotte-for.html#.UxaPlbVWHIU

http://www.wralsportsfan.com/ciaa-agrees-to-keep-tournament-in-charlotte-relocate-headquarters/13446246/

http://www.wbtv.com/story/24871890/will-charlotte-keep-the-ciaa

http://www.wsoctv.com/news/news/local/ciaa-discuss-future-tournament-monday/nd4m2/

http://www.wccbcharlotte.com/news/local/CIAA-Tournament-To-Stay-in-Charlotte-for-Six-More-Years-248303591.html

http://www.qcitymetro.com/news/articles/ciaa_will_move_headquarters_to_charlotte_keep_tournament_here_for_another_6_years040455760.cfm

https://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Daily/Issues/2014/03/04/Events-and-Attractions/CIAA.aspx

http://www.wcnc.com/sports/CIAA-tourney-leaving-Charlotte-248242221.html

http://www.journalnow.com/sports/colleges/ciaa-tournaments-staying-in-charlotte-league-office-moving-there/article_12ed9288-a31b-11e3-a2cc-0017a43b2370.html

http://wfae.org/post/ciaa-moves-charlotte-and-keeps-tournament-here

http://www.examiner.com/article/ciaa-basketball-stays-through-2020-and-will-relocate-offices-to-charlotte

Ted Rants: A Not So Excellent Adventure!

For some time now, various elements of what the Right Wing refers to as the Lame Stream Media, among other pejoratives, has been dissecting the most recent anti-Obama rant, courtesy of Ted Nugent.  Mr. Nugent, the Millennials and Generation Z cohorts, is a Rock Musician who era of popularity principally spanned the late 60’s to 1980.  He continued to tour through at least 2011.  However, his more recent media buzz has emanated from the socio-political genre.  He is a social conservative and outspoken advocate of Second Amendment protections.

In 2012, Nugent endorsed Mitt Romney for President, after a great deal of soul-searching.  He was reportedly reluctant because Mr. Romney, prior to seeking the highest office in the land, was known for more moderate positions on Gun Control.  Mr. Romney’s repudiation of those previously held positions, a heart-to-heart with the man who would be (the Republican) President, and their mutual Michigan roots were, apparently, enough to mollify the Rocker from the Motor City.

After lending his endorsement to Mitt, Nugent voiced what the “Thug Music” crew call “Ride of Die” mantra.  He declared to the NRA:

• I will be dead or in jail by this time next year if Barack Obama is re-elected

• Compared the President to a coyote that should be shot

• Called the Obama Administration vile, evil, and America-hating

• We need to ride onto the battlefield and cut their heads off

• Our Government is wiping its ass with the Constitution

• We’ll be a suburb of Indonesia if Obama is elected President (again)

• Invoked folks to take up arms to shoot the President

Fast-forward to 2012, and Teddy apparently rethought, or delayed the execution of his implied threats to “take-out” President Obama.  After all, he was re-elected, and more than a year has passed.  Nevertheless, there is no time like the present for a new rant.  During the week dedicated to the observance of the contributions and sacrifices made by Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Mr. Nugent decided to let loose with more of his best work.  This time, his vitriol, aimed at a group called Guns.com, included:

• Communist-raised (Graduated from Socialist, I guess)

• Communist-educated

• Communist-nurtured (Different from raising, I guess, though I don’t know how, exactly)

• Bad man

• Treasonous

• Gangster

• Sub-human Mongrel (akin to the German word, Untermensch, which the Nazis called Jews…to justify genocide in the Jewish Community

Nugent hit the road right after his recent comments to campaign for Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Texas Gubernatorial candidate, who has his own history with controversial comments and laws inhibiting voting rights.  Texas’ new Voter ID law is so restrictive that it made it difficult for some women to vote because they married, and their maiden name appeared as a middle name.  More obviously, the law disproportionately affected the low income, people of color, students, and the elderly.

Rather than condemning Nugent for his remarks, the campaign welcomed the help.  A spokesperson noted, “The controversy is what he said in the past.  We are not endorsing Ted Nugent, he is supporting us,” a campaign aide told CNN.  “It’s easy to criticize some of the language he has used in the past.  He is protected under the Constitution, like you and I.”

A number of prominent Republicans have distanced themselves from Nugent’s comments.  Some such as Ted Cruz did so, softly; others made their denunciation quite clear.

Cruz, whom many speculate will be a presidential candidate in the 2016 election, initially evaded CNN inquiries about Nugent’s comments, but eventually stated gingerly, “Those sentiments there, of course I don’t agree with them.  You’ve never heard me say such a thing, nor would I.”

When asked directly about campaigning with Nugent, Cruz at first avoided the question.  He later relented and answered, saying, “I haven’t yet, and I’m going to avoid engaging in hypotheticals.”  Alternately, Nugent told the audience in a Google Hangout with a Detroit rock station that he and Cruz “have worked closely together.”

After Texas Governor Rick Perry, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, and Arizona Senator John McCain, fellow GOP conservatives, blasted him, Nugent finally managed to construct and proffer a pseudo-apology.  His rendering:

“I do apologize – not necessarily to the President, but on behalf of much better men than myself, for using the streetfighter terminology of ‘subhuman mongrel’ instead of just using more understandable language, such as, ‘violator of his oath to the Constitution.”

Mr. Nugent is no stranger to controversy or incendiary language.  He leveraged outrage over these comments to ratchet up his diatribe to attack Hillary Clinton, saying, she has “spare scrotums.”  Subsequently, in a series of more than 40 tweets, Nugent questioned whether his terminology was really that offensive.  Oh well, I guess you could say, “Ted Rants: A Not So Excellent Adventure!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Nugent

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/us/2014/02/24/erin-intv-nugent-president-and-cnn-are-wrong.cnn.html

http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/florida-house-candidate-joshua-black-calls-for-hanging-of-president-obama/2161944

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/21/outdoor-channels-ted-nugent-says-subhuman-mongr/197669

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/18/cnns-wolf-blitzer-condemns-ted-nugents-subhuman/198103

http://t.mediaite.com/mediaite/#!/entry/blitzer-gets-superdetailed-on-nazi-origins-of-nugents-subhuman-mongrel,5303b79ab7d8d24162cba74f/2

http://youtu.be/7_fgA01nUoI

https://www.diversityinc.com/news/ted-nugent-calls-president-obama-subhuman-mongrel-offensive-tweets/

http://crossfire.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/18/jones-calls-out-ted-nugent-over-racist-comments/

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/21/top-republicans-condemn-ted-nugents-subhuman-mo/198168

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2014/02/21/Rocker-Ted-Nugent-Apologizes-for-Using-Phrase-Subhuman-Mongrel

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Ted-Nugent-Greg-Abbott-Rick-Perry-Texas/2014/02/21/id/554067

http://youtu.be/D-2o1HFiFVI

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2014/02/25/jeff-nugent-says-brother-ted-nugent-crossed-a-line-with-sub-human-comment/

So Many Angry White Men: Why Is That?

Last week, I wrote about the case of the Loud Music Murder.  Over the weekend, a jury convicted Michael Dunn on four of the five counts, with which he was charged.  The convictions covered three counts of attempted second-degree murder and one count of hurling a lethal object into a vehicle (translation: he shot into a car, including while the driver was trying to flee a barrage of bullets).

During this week’s news coverage, Mr. Dunn, and George Zimmerman (Trayvon Martin’s murderer) professed themselves to have been victims.  Dunn, in his specific case, describes himself as both victim and victor.  In both instances, the perpetrators indicated that they feared for their own lives.  That assertion was critical in validating the efficacy of their Stand Your Ground claims.  In his version of the story, Dunn told jurors that he saw a gun.  He had initially told officers he saw what he thought was the barrel of a gun, but also stated the object may have been a stick or some other object.  In the “lawyered-up,” recalibrated for the jury story, Mr. Dunn expressed full confidence that what he saw was a gun.

Despite the fact that police never found a weapon of any kind, defense attorneys were apparently more persuasive in convincing jurors that Dunn saw the alleged ghost gun, than prosecutors were in arguing that there was no such weapon.  The irony of this is, even though the defense could not produce a weapon, and the young men fired no shots, the jury found itself unable to find the defendant guilty of the only charge that resulted in a young man’s death.  The one count that resulted in a hung jury was the first-degree murder of Jordan Davis.

The three counts of attempted second-degree murder each carry a 20-year sentence.  The lethal object count carries a 15-year sentence.  Together, the four charges for which the jury convicted Mr. Dunn indicate the 47-year old will spend up to 75 years behind bars.

That is certainly a substantial consequence for his actions.  Still, what concerns many observers is the fact that such an outcome may be interpreted as Dunn having been convicted for being a poor shot.  That is to say, the jury convicted him for the three instances in which he failed to kill.

In last week’s post, I shared several of Dunn’s controversial letters, which includes these:

Mr. Dunn wrote a number of letters that contain controversial, if not combustible statements.  In one letter to his daughter, he is alleged to have written, “This may sound a bit radical but if more people would arm themselves and kill these **** idiots when they’re threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior.” (As reported by WNET News)

He also wrote, “As you can imagine, I’m not getting much sympathy from the press.  The’re (sic) a bunch of liberal b…..s.  North Florida is more like the Deep South.  They seem to have a lot of racial guilt, or at least the prosecutor’s office does.”

In another letter, he wrote, “It’s spooky how racist everyone is up here and how biased toward blacks the courts are.  This jail is full of blacks and they all act like thugs.”

In a letter to his girlfriend, he wrote, “My fear is that if I get a black on my jury it will be a mistrial, as I am convinced they will be racially biased.”

Since the trial ended, authorities released several phone transcripts, including one in which Dunn not only claims victim status, but also suggests he is akin to a rape victim.  When taken in whole cloth, he may have claimed he was scared (feared for his life), but I submit it is difficult to argue in good conscience that Dunn is not an angry dude.  He maintains a heaping helping of vitriol for young black men.

Despite the fact that I believe Dunn’s case has race bias all over it, and through-and-through, the one thing that I believe attaches itself to most of the violent gun deaths we have been seeing over the past several years is anger.  Moreover, in most of the cases, whether Stand Your Ground, or mass murders, that anger has made itself evident in white men.

So why are white men so angry?  There are many popular theories that observers posit to explain this phenomenon.  Most of them revolve, in one way or another, around concerns about the Incredible Shrinking White Majority.  There are several components to this argument.  Most accounts include:

• The historical dominance of white males in American society

• Low birth rates among white Americans

• Relatively higher birth rates among African Americans and non-white Latinos

• Non-white immigration

• Emergence of Latinos as the country’s largest minority

• Census reports that project a majority-minority nation by 2043

• President Barack Hussein Obama

Undoubtedly, there are other arguments and concerns out there in the universe.  However, one can trace many if not most of them, back to one or more of the items above.  While, none of these issues fundamentally alters the composition of Fortune 500 corporate boardrooms, or the net worth of America’s wealthiest Barons of business and tech, it is in many ways all about optics.

This country is a special place.  In some quarters, there is a long-standing, persistent, and salient argument that holds we are an exceptional nation.  Regardless of your position on that question, there is no denying that America was the dominant national presence of the 20th Century, and by many measures, continues to call the top of the heap, home.

For many, this lofty perch, and the accomplishments that undergird it, symbolizes the accomplishments of white men and the privilege that accompanies them.  Not surprising, any pending change to that comfortably familiar narrative it apt to produce some angst; and so it has.  That palpable anxiety, not surprisingly, appears more frequently, and more explosively, not in those who sit atop chambers of wealth and success, but among those who are still climbing the ladders to success, and who feel they have the most to lose.

These men too often believe that “the others” are taking that which by virtue of erstwhile white privilege, belongs to them.  In other words, I am positing that it is not about loud music, popcorn, or cell phones.  No, it is about the baseless assertion that blacks and Latinos are taking white folks stuff, most notably, the Presidency. “So Many Angry White Men: Why Is That?”  That, in a nutshell, is why!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/02/did_white_male_insecurity_kill_jordan_davis.html?wpisrc=burger

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/18/opinion/cevallos-dunn-verdict-critics/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/sides-michael-dunn-trial-speak-jury-ruling-article-1.1617789

http://kuow.org/post/verdict-floridas-loud-music-trial-causes-uproar-over-self-defense-laws

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/olivia-cole/elegy-for-fairness_b_4804687.html

http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2014/02/the-political-verdict-on-michael-dunn.html

http://www.firstcoastnews.com/story/news/local/michael-dunn-trial/2014/02/18/i-was-the-victim-michael-dunn-jailhouse-phone-call/5574135/

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/did-prosecutors-overcharge-accused-loud-music-shooter/

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/371391/few-thoughts-michael-dunn-trial-charles-c-w-cooke

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-dunn-described-himself-as-victim-victor-after-killing-teenager-in-argument-over-music/

“Turn Down That Music!”

Once upon a time Florida was known primarily for being the home of endless sunshine, golden beaches, and no state taxes.  Today, those items are still true, yet none of them springs to mind when I think of the Seminole State.  Whenever I hear anyone mention Florida, I think, immediately, of the State’s Stand Your Ground Law.

Of course, it is important to point out that such statutes are commonplace in the contemporary American milieu.  Yet, no State in the Union has had more or more controversial shootings in which the law was a key element of the defense.  The Trayvon Martin (armed with a bag of Skittles and a beverage) case may be the instance that gained the most notoriety.  The Chad Oulson (armed with a bag of popcorn and a cell phone) case may be the most recent incident.  However, the Jordan Davis (yet to be determined whether a weapon was present) case is currently unfolding in trial.

During the days of the Old West, Tombstone, Arizona, in Cochise County, was the epitome of the television version of the Wild, Wild West.  Tombstone was a place where the notion of Stand Your Ground was the order of the day.  It is the real live location of the Earp Brothers’ (Wyatt, Virgil, Warren, and Morgan) famous “Gunfight at the O.K. Corral.”  Stand Your Ground was a way of life…and/or, unfortunately, death. 

I do not equate Florida today with 19th Century Arizona.  However, it seems some people do.  Moreover, it appears that far too many of those who do, not only have the weapons to prove it, but the will, and more important, the desire, to demonstrate their convictions. 

Mr. Michael Dunn is currently on trial in Jacksonville for the death of young Mr. Davis.  The case is under litigation, and I do not presume to know the likely outcome.  The George Zimmerman (Trayvon Martin) case reminded us that the jury will make the ultimate call.  In the interim, there are a few items worth noting. 

Among points stipulated, we have the following: 

• A 47 year-old white male standing his ground in November 2012

• A 17 year-old black teen shot to death during the encounter

• A shooter claiming self-defense and fear for his life

• No weapon found on the victim, in the vehicle, or on the other passengers

• The shooter fired up to 10 shots, three of which hit the victim

• The shooter continued to shoot after the teens fled

• The shooter and his fiancé left the scene & spent the night in a hotel

• They did not call police that night

• They saw on TV the next morning a teen had been killed in the incident

• They did not then call police

• The shooter pleaded not guilty to all charges stemming from the incident

• The shooter has been charged with murder and attempted murder

• The shooter testified he left the scene so his dog could potty

• The shooter said he told his fiancé he saw a gun

• His fiancé said he did not

• The prosecution provided a letter in which the shooter wrote, he did not

• The shooter said he heard Davis call him a cracker and a m……….r

• The shooter said he heard Davis threaten to kill him

• The shooter said the victim got out of the car

• The shooter said he then began firing

The above items are a sampling, and do not represent the entirety of events of the first eight days of Mr. Dunn’s trial.  They comprise a view largely representative of the Prosecution’s angle because the Prosecution was presenting its case during this time.  Undoubtedly, the Defense will vigorously work to construct a distinctly different narrative as it presents its case. 

In addition to the items above, sources report Mr. Dunn wrote a number of letters that contain controversial, if not combustible statements.  In one letter to his daughter, he is alleged to have written, “This may sound a bit radical but if more people would arm themselves and kill these **** idiots when they’re threatening you, eventually they may take the hint and change their behavior.” (As reported by WNET News) 

He also wrote, “As you can imagine, I’m not getting much sympathy from the press.  The’re (sic) a bunch of liberal b…..s.  North Florida is more like the Deep South.  They seem to have a lot of racial guilt, or at least the prosecutor’s office does.

In another letter, he wrote, “It’s spooky how racist everyone is up here and how biased toward blacks the courts are.  This jail is full of blacks and they all act like thugs.

In a letter to his girlfriend, he wrote, “My fear is that if I get a black on my jury it will be a mistrial, as I am convinced they will be racially biased.” 

I am not endeavoring to prematurely, convict Mr. Dunn.  If anything, I am once again, trumpeting the view that Stand Your Ground is an implausible concept in the 21st Century.  Like it or not, this is not the Old West.  In my view, Stand Your Ground is an anachronistic notion that emboldens people to abandon caution and any instinct to avoid conflict, and instead invites them to take the law into their own amply armed hands.  As such, it has readily discernible negative consequences on the fabric of our society.

Of course, the Stand Your Ground phenomenon is a systemic offshoot of the enthusiastic efforts of the Gun Lobby to promote “all things guns.”  In retrospect, may I suggest, you would be wise to take heed, if anyone ever asks you to, “Turn Down That Music!”  If this instance is any indication, not doing so could result in deadly consequences.

I’m done; holla back! 

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/11/justice/florida-loud-music-trial/ 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/11/us-usa-florida-shooting-dunn-idUSBREA1A1HJ20140211

http://news.yahoo.com/prosecution-wraps-case-florida-loud-music-murder-trial-231822065.html

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/michael-dunn-trial-state-rests-in-loud-music-murder-case/

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/prosecution-rests-trial-michael-davis-fla-killing-loud-music-article-1.1609070 

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-loud-music-murder-trial-michael-dunn-20140211,0,6580882.story#axzz2t4WhBxOW 

http://www.theroot.com/articles/culture/2014/02/michael_dunn_takes_stand_racist_letters_take_center_stage_online.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tombstone,_Arizona

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florida

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stand-your-ground_law

http://www.leg.state.fl.us/statutes/index.cfm?App_mode=Display_Statute&URL=0700-0799/0776/Sections/0776.013.html

Is God a Football Fan?

For weeks leading up to the 2014 Super Bowl, there was an active discussion regarding the wisdom, or lack thereof, in choosing a location in the Northeast, or any non-warm weather city for that matter, for the big game.  In the age of the Super Bowl era, which began in 1967, prior to 2014, organizers scheduled all Super Bowls in warm weather cities or domes stadiums.

NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, in explaining the Selection Committee’s decision to choose MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey as the venue for this past Sunday’s event, Super Bowl XXXXVIII, said the committee decided it would be good to spread the opportunity to host the game all across the country.  The New York-Newark area undoubtedly made a compelling case for hosting the event.  Still, there is a reason the League opted not to hold its signature event outside in the elements, in a cold weather city.  Only time would tell if deviating from the tried and true model was merely a mistake, or a miscalculation of “gi-normous” proportion.

In the week prior to the Big Game, an unusual phenomenon known as the Polar Vortex generated the coldest temperatures in 20 years for half the United States, including Metropolitan New York and New Jersey, which coincidentally was set to host the Super Bowl.  In the days, leading up to Super Sunday, staff and contractors executed what amounted to snow and ice removal drills at MetLife Stadium.  By middle of last week, meteorologists’ weather models projected that the game time temperatures would be in the 40’s with no precipitation.

In deed, that is just what happened.  The game was played in conditions about as ideal as could be expected for the first weekend in February at MetLife Stadium.  However, according to the New York Daily News, snow hit the Greater New York area just hours after the Super Bowl, starting around 4:00 a.m. Monday.  The storm blanketed the stadium with snow on Monday, but more important, airlines canceled more than 2,150 flights nationally, according to the website FlightAware.  After reviewing the situation, I have one simple question.  “Is God a Football Fan?”  While I do not even purport to process and answer that query, I did conclude one thing.  He does not root for the Broncos, at least not this season.

That is all I have.  I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.examiner.com/article/supersnow-monday-follows-superbowl-sunday

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_vortex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_North_American_cold_wave

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Super_Bowl_games

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roger_Goodell

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/winter-storm-hits-nyc-area-hours-super-bowl-article-1.1600260

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/post-super-bowl-storm-strands-football-fans-airports-article-1.1600937

http://nypost.com/2014/02/03/snowstorm-expected-to-leave-up-to-8-inches-behind/

http://nation.time.com/2014/02/03/winter-storm-takes-aim-at-east-closes-schools/

http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304626804579361290565910438?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702304626804579361290565910438.html

State of the Union 2014: President Obama Says Strong!

President Obama addressed a Joint Session of Congress last night.  As he does every year, he delivered his State of the Union Address, 2014 Version.  As he does always, he pointed to a variety of Americans who for some reason have come to his attention.  He mentioned the success of specific programs, and the hard work and resourcefulness of a variety of individuals.  Mostly, he challenged the Congress to join him in efforts to support an overdue American Revival.

He touched upon many ideas including enhancing educational opportunities, expanding tech resources in high schools and colleges, and tweaking the alliances between high schools and colleges so that student may more readily obtain access, and to afford the opportunities that come with their new education.  The list below includes a significant but not exhaustive list of the President’s aims:

  • Lowering Corporate taxes
  • Immigration Reform
  • Executive Orders in lieu of compromise
  • Income inequality
  • Minimum wage
  • Earned Income Tax Credit
  • MyRA
  • Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
  • Voting Rights Act Reform
  • Gun Violence Reduction
  • War in Afghanistan wind down
  • Syrian Regime
  • State of Israel
  • Iran’s nuclear program
  • American Leadership

The President called upon Congress, Wall Street, and Main Street to join him to help fulfill the American promise that, despite the inaction of an often recalcitrant Congress (my adjective, not his), still shines brightly.  President Obama has now stood before the American people and delivered a State of the Union Address five times.  He has addressed Joint Sessions of Congress on three other occasions.  I have watched most of the President’s major speeches.  As his moments in national conversation go, in my view, this may have been his finest hour.

Certainly, he has rendered phraseology that we might deem more impassioned.  He has spoken with more soaring rhetoric and he has offered a grander vision.  However, for this moment in time, when Republicans expected an angry, pugnacious, confrontational speech, the President was anything but contentious.  He was confident, and self-assured, but not smug.  He was relaxed and engaging, thoughtful and charming.  He was funny, but genuinely sincere, humble, and self-effacing, but clear and unequivocal.  Most importantly, while he engaged the audience in the Chamber, he made his case to the American people.

There is no doubt President Obama is aware he is languishing at a 43% approval rating.  His response was to make a case for a series of initiatives.  He asked for Congressional help, but he explained in granular detail his intentions to employ the use of Executive Orders where applicable, if Congressional Republicans continued their obstructionist ways (again, my language, not his).  In his words, he proposed “A Year of Action, with or without Congress.”

President Obama pitched America as the place that others look to as an example for all manner of endeavors.  In effect, as for the “State of the Union 2014: President Obama Says Strong!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/obamas-2014-state-of-the-union-address-full-text/

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/28/politics/2014-state-of-the-union/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

http://www.c-span.org/Events/President-Obamas-2014-State-of-the-Union-Speech/10737427373/

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/01/13/get-ready-president-obama-s-2014-state-union-address

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/28/politics/state-of-the-union-sales-pitch/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/28/state-of-the-union-speech-2014_n_4590441.html

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/27/22433040-2014-state-of-the-union-six-things-to-expect-during-obamas-speech

http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-state-of-the-union-obama-2014-20140128,0,2195484.story#axzz2rlC4uUtb

http://nbcpolitics.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/27/22433040-2014-state-of-the-union-six-things-to-expect-during-obamas-speech

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_State_of_the_Union_Address

President Obama Speaks: Race Matters

It took five years, but President Obama, after two successful presidential elections, finally concedes the obvious…in the great American narrative, exceptionalism notwithstanding, Race MattersDavid Remnick, editor of the New Yorker magazine, sat with the President in a series of interviews that resulted in an estimated 17,000-word profile (which equates to approximately 42-43 pages, double-spaced, with 1 inch margins, in New Times Roman 12-point type).  The conversations took place over hours, sometimes in the White House, sometimes on Air Force 1, some late last year, and some earlier this year.

In this past Sunday’s issue, the Washington Post highlighted the New Yorker interview by pulling 17 points from the 17,000 words.  The items of emphasis ranged from the Race to the NFL, to Marijuana, to Iran, to Syria, to the NSA, to David Snowden, and more.  I have included all 17 summaries below for your review and convenience:

1. The NFL: Obama feels fine about watching football despite the reports of severe concussions and retired players with brain damage. “I would not let my son play pro football,” he said. “But … these guys, they know what they’re doing. They know what they’re buying into. It is no longer a secret. It’s sort of the feeling I have about smokers, you know?”

2. Obama’s memoir: When Obama leaves the White House, he will write a memoir that literary agent Andrew Wylie predicted would fetch $17 million to $20 million. First lady Michelle Obama has already started to work on her memoir. Marty Nesbitt, Obama’s friend, said the president will likely focus on “human rights, education, and health and wellness.”

3.  Race: Obama acknowledges that the color of his skin might have affect how some Americans perceive his presidency, but he doesn’t think it has a major overall effect one way or the other. “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President,” he said. “Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black President.”

4. What’s in Obama’s bagRemnick tells readers what Marvin Nicholson, Obama’s body man, carries in a bag for the president: “pens, the briefing books, the Nicorette, the Sharpies, the Advil, the throat lozenges, the iPad, the iPod, the protein bars, the bottle of Black Forest Berry Honest Tea.”

5. Obama has started socializing moreObama said he hadn’t socialized more in the past because he has two young daughters at home. “I had two young daughters who I wanted to spend time with—and that I wasn’t in a position to work the social scene in Washington,” he said. But now that they’re older, Obama and his wife have been hosting more dinners, with the president drinking a Martini or two, and Obama sometimes pushing guests to stay past 1 a.m. “I’m a night owl! Have another drink,” the president encouraged one set of guests.

6. Obama meets with presidential historians: Obama has had a number of presidential historians over as guests, including Doris Kearns Goodwin and Robert Caro, whose work on Lyndon Johnson often is cited as an example of how a president can more effectively get in his agenda through Congress. Remnick writes: “At the most recent dinner he attended at the White House, Caro had the distinct impression that Obama was cool to him, annoyed, perhaps, at the notion appearing in the press that his latest Johnson volume was an implicit rebuke to him. As we were leaving, I said to Obama, ‘You know, my book wasn’t an unspoken attack on you, it’s a book about Lyndon Johnson,’  Caro recalled.” Obama and his team continue to rebuff the idea that more social outings and pressure would lead Republicans to embrace his ideas. Obama pointed out that when Johnson “lost that historic majority [in Congress], and the glow of that landslide victory faded, he had the same problems with Congress that most Presidents at one point or another have.”

7. Marijuana: Obama said he is most concerned about the impact of drug laws on minorities and the poor.  “Middle-class kids don’t get locked up for smoking pot, and poor kids do,” he said. “And African-American kids and Latino kids are more likely to be poor and less likely to have the resources and the support to avoid unduly harsh penalties.” He added that he supports Colorado and Washington’s efforts to “go forward” with their efforts at legalization and decriminalization.

8. Malia’s career plans: Obama’s older daughter, Malia, wants to be a filmmaker.

9. Obama’s must-do listRemnick asked Obama about what he must get done before the end of 2016. He responded,”I will measure myself at the end of my presidency in large part by whether I began the process of rebuilding the middle class and the ladders into the middle class, and reversing the trend toward economic bifurcation in this society.”

10. Iran: Remnick writes that Obama believes if the current diplomatic efforts with Iran prevail, it could bring a new stability to the region.  “It would be profoundly in the interest of citizens throughout the region if Sunnis and Shias weren’t intent on killing each other,” Obama said. “And although it would not solve the entire problem, if we were able to get Iran to operate in a responsible fashion — not funding terrorist organizations, not trying to stir up sectarian discontent in other countries, and not developing a nuclear weapon — you could see an equilibrium developing between Sunni, or predominantly Sunni, Gulf states and Iran in which there’s competition, perhaps suspicion, but not an active or proxy warfare.”

11. SyriaObama said he feels confident that he has made the right decisions on Syria, although he confided, when prompted, that he is “haunted by what’s happened” there. But, he added, “It is very difficult to imagine a scenario in which our involvement in Syria would have led to a better outcome, short of us being willing to undertake an effort in size and scope similar to what we did in Iraq.”

12. Drones: Obama also defended his strategy of using drones to kill terrorism suspects abroad, saying that his “preference” remains to capture and prosecute them, but if that proves infeasible, “I cannot stand by and do nothing.” He continued, “What I’ve tried to do is to tighten the process so much and limit the risks of civilian casualties so much that we have the least fallout from those actions. But it’s not perfect.”

13.  NSA/Snowden: Obama said he does not regard the leaks by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden as comparable to the Pentagon Papers or other leaks vindicated by history.  Remnick writes: “The leaks, he said, had ‘put people at risk’ but revealed nothing illegal. And though the leaks raised ‘legitimate policy questions’ about N.S.A. operations, ‘the issue then is: Is the only way to do that by giving some twenty-nine-year-old free rein to basically dump a mountain of information, much of which is definitely legal, definitely necessary for national security, and should properly be classified?’”

14. Clemency for Snowden: Asked about the prospect of a deal with Snowden, Obama responded, “I do not have a yes/no answer on clemency for Edward Snowden. This is an active case, where charges have been brought.”

15. How to address inequality: Although he is focused on inequality and economic opportunity, Obama recognizes he will have a limited capacity to address the issues. “The appetite for tax-and-transfer strategies, even among Democrats, much less among independents or Republicans, is probably somewhat limited.” Obama said. “Marshall Plan for the inner city is not going to get through Congress anytime soon.”

16. His key strength: Obama believes that his equanimity endures as one of his key strengths. “I have strengths and I have weaknesses, like every president, like every person,” he said. “I do think one of my strengths is temperament. I am comfortable with complexity, and I think I’m pretty good at keeping my moral compass while recognizing that I am a product of original sin.”

17. A president’s limited power to change: Obama said that even the greatest presidents — like Abraham Lincoln — had to operate in the currents of history. “[D]espite being the greatest President, in my mind, in our history, it took another hundred and fifty years before African-Americans had anything approaching formal equality, much less real equality. I think that doesn’t diminish Lincoln’s achievements, but it acknowledges that at the end of the day we’re part of a long-running story. We just try to get our paragraph right.” Remnick concludes the story with Obama saying, “I just wanted to add one thing to that business about the great-man theory of history. The President of the United States cannot remake our society, and that’s probably a good thing.” Obama then adds, “Not ‘probably’. It’s definitely a good thing.”

As should be apparent from the Title above, the item for consideration by this post is race.  The Post’s summary notes the President acknowledges that:

  • The color of his skin might have affected how some Americans perceive his Presidency
  • He does not think it has a major overall effect one way or the other
  • “There’s no doubt that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the idea of a black President.”
  • “Now, the flip side of it is there are some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black President.”

As is always the case, there are ready detractors to the President’s comments.  Howard Kurtz, writing for Fox News about the entire series of interviews asserts that the President provided the sense of a man who has abandoned what he once billed as the audacity of hope.

Further to the Right, Rush Limbaugh characterized the President’s remarks as derangement and delusion.  In fact, he referred to a specific excerpt:

  • “As Obama ticked off a list of first-term achievements — the economic rescue, the forty-four straight months of job growth, a reduction in carbon emissions, a spike in clean-energy technology — he seemed efficient but contained, running at three-quarters speed, like an athlete playing a midseason road game of modest consequence.”

“This is derangement and delusion – and the reporter, Remnick in this case, just eats it all up,” Rush said.

Limbaugh clarifies his position by arguing there has been no economic rescue, there have not been 44 months of job growth, there has been no reduction in carbon emissions, there has been no spike in clean energy technology; ergo, the President’s remarks are delusional, and Mr. Remnick, apparently an unwitting conspirator/accomplice.  In addition, Mr. Limbaugh suggested the President played the race card.

This last point, which is popular with the Right, and which was popular with them, even before the President weighed in on the matter, is but a straw man.  Nevertheless, the notion of the President playing the race card is at the heart of the matter I want most to address.  Remnick directly pushes back on the idea President Obama played the race card.  In fact, he argues flatly that the President did no such thing.

Here’s the deal.  The President has throughout his tenure, figuratively bent over backward and into pretzel shape, rather than attribute to negative racial attitudes, opposition to him or his policies.  Now there is no doubt that was smart, and courageous; it was even expedient.  However, it was neither straight forward, nor honest.

Beyond the limiting confines of another election, President Obama finally freely, and as usual, articulately spoke about one of America’s oldest and dirtiest little secrets; Race Matters.  In doing so, he demonstrated his genuine awareness that that knife cuts both ways.

I respect the President’s reticence in charging headlong into the issue of race relations.  He is after all, the President of all the people, not just black people.  The real issue is far deeper than the PresidencyDr. Cornel West wrote a book entitled Race Matters, published in 1994.  The book is an analysis of moral authority and racial debates concerning skin color in America.  Ninety-one years earlier, in 1903, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote in his classic work, The Souls of Black Folk, “This meaning is not without interest to you, Gentle Reader; for the problem of the Twentieth Century is the problem of color line.”

Well into the second decade of the Twenty-First Century, it is fair to say the color line is still a problem; Dr. Du Bois had no idea how prophetic his words were, nor for how long they would be apt.  Say whatever you like; “President Obama Speaks: Race Matters!”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: https://thesphinxofcharlotte.com/. Find a new post each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

Consult the links below for more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-19/obama-says-racial-animus-may-soften-support-new-yorker-reports.html

http://www.cnn.com/2014/01/20/politics/obama-battle-scars/

https://grabien.com/story.php?id=4601&order

https://grabien.com/file.php?id=13114&searchorder=date

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/01/21/no-obama-didn-t-play-the-race-card.html

http://nypost.com/2014/01/19/obama-some-folks-dont-like-me-because-im-black/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2014/01/19/17-highlights-from-the-new-yorkers-17000-word-profile-on-obama/

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2014/01/27/140127fa_fact_remnick

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/19/obama-marijuana-alcohol_n_4627740.html

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/01/20/obama_s_deranged_new_yorker_interview

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/01/21/obama-at-length-why-falls-flat-in-endless-new-yorker-interview-1300073542/