Ted Cruz: The Road to Default is Paved with Bad Intentions!

It’s time to Break It Down!

Rafael Edward “Ted” Cruz, the Texan by way of Canada, has leveraged his15 minutes of fame into 15 days, and he is going for more.  Senator Cruz, the architect of the idea to defund, disassemble, or delay Obamacare has launched himself into the role of de facto leader of the GOP/Tea Party. 

After serving a little more than 10 months in the U.S. SenateMr. Cruz has bedazzled a key segment of his GOP/Tea Party contemporaries in the Senate and more importantly, in the House of Representatives.  He has managed to lead them in Pied Piper fashion to shut down the federal government, and to threaten to drive the country into one of the unenviable annals of geo-political history, that of our first-ever default

Many close observers, including several in the Grand Ol’ Party have given voice to the notion that the Junior Senator from Texas does not find his motivation from a desire for his Party to attain a perch on ideological or political high ground.  Rather they think he derives his impetus from the prospect that his crusade may enable him to take the lead in the 2016 race for the GOP Nomination for the White House.  Moreover, even some GOP insiders insist that his gambit has harmed their beloved Party, and more importantly, the American people.

A little over two years ago, in August 2011, Standard & Poor’s (S&P) issued America it’s first-ever credit downgrade, moving it’s rating from AAA (Outstanding) to AA+ (Excellent), and this was after Congress reach an agreement to avert a default.  Fast forward to the here and now, and a few Republican voices are actually contending that crossing the threshold of the October 17th deadline for resolving the debt ceiling crisis is not a disaster for either the economy, not the country.  This is a position that flies in the face of the fact the economy has lost an estimated $20 billion during the first 15 days of the partial government shutdown.

If that were not enough, yesterday, credit rating agency Fitch warned that it might downgrade U.S. debt.  Last time, S&P opted to issue a downgrade, even though Congress did not actually default on the nation’s debt.  What are the chances we might blow through the deadline, without experiencing similar consequences?      

Fitch has already placed its “AAA” U.S. rating on “rating watch negative,” a potential prelude to a downgrade.  The 2011 S&P downgrade was an historic first.  If the country crosses the debt ceiling deadline, midnight tonight, it would mark yet another dubious and inauspicious American first.  When I consider the lunacy associated with the actions that that have yet again driven us to the economic brink, it is hard to argue against the premise that these United States are “Exceptional”…in a bad way.  For all the crowing and posturing, that invariably hovers around this faux construct, antics such as this tarnish in a most high profile way, the validity of that position.

Senator Cruz has refused, up to this point, to relinquish his hold on the title, Anti-Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) Poster Child.  Moreover, he appears to revel in it.  The Senate, according to a number of news accounts, is on a path to forge a compromise.  Through yesterday, the House was reticent to get on board with the idea. 

As we enter the proverbial 11th hour, speculation persists that there will be a last-minute deal.  While I offer no prediction on the timing, I do believe the impasse is near an end.  Moreover, after all that has happened, I am convinced that one thing is clear – Cruz Control: The Road to Default is Paved with Bad Intentions!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the linkhttp://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

Nine Years Old: A Ninja in Training?

It’s time to Break It Down!

What the L?

Last weeks post was short.  This week’s is even briefer.

Dictionary.com defines Ninja as:

“A member of a feudal Japanese society of mercenary agents, highly trained in martial arts and stealth (ninjutsu) that were hired for covert purposes ranging from espionage to sabotage and assassination.

OK, so the 9 year-old who covertly and stealthily, hopped a plane and flew from Minneapolis to Las Vegas did not also use karate, commit espionage and/or assassinate anyone…yet…that we know of!  However, let’s face it; the kid has an evolved sense of flirting with high-risk behaviors and situations, and the skill set and ‘nads to pull it off.  Where was the NSA, and for God’s sake in this instance anyway, where was the TSA, when we needed them?

Let’s review quickly.  The young man, who is quickly developing a bucket list of nefarious feats, also has crashing a Water Park, and auto theft listed on the notches he has carved on his small but impressive belt.  He boarded a flight and flew from Minneapolis to Vegas…without an escort, and more significantly, sans ticket.  This must be a new low for both the TSA and Delta Airlines.  Regardless of whether this kid is building credits as he auditions for the lead role in the James Bond flick, in say, 2044, when he will be like 40, his caprice cannot be overlooked as we soberly consider targets of opportunity for potential terrorists attacks.  The basis for alarm should be clear.

In describing his precocious scion, the young man’s father said, “I don’t have an angel, OK. I have a 9-year-old.  To me, he’s got a behavioral problem”

No schiznit!  Little is more evident than that an angel, this young man is not, and yes, his behavior is problematic.  Alternately, I am unconvinced that he 9 years old.  Can we get Mr. Trump to dredge up his Birth Certificate?  I for one would feel better if The Donald affirmed that for us.

In other pertinent developments, a Hennepin County (Minneapolis) Public Health official described the boy as “a challenging child.”  His mother works at the Minneapolis-St. Paul  International Airport.  Though the parents say they thought he was visiting a neighbor, The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports that there is an investigation into whether his mother helped him.  In related news, the TSA employee whom the young man eluded to board the plane was said to be “distracted.”

Undoubtedly, there are many questions, still unanswered, surrounding this matter.  The only one I have is; is this kid “Nine Years Old: A Ninja in Training?”

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://www.cnn.com/2013/10/08/us/vegas-flight-child/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-201_162-57606505/minn-boy-who-snuck-on-vegas-flight-has-troubled-past-police-say/

http://abcnews.go.com/US/boy-boards-flight-minneapolis-las-vegas-ticket/story?id=20486346

http://www.myfoxtwincities.com/story/23622074/boy-boards-plane-at-minn-airport-without-ticket

http://ktla.com/2013/10/07/boy-hops-plane-to-vegas-apparently-alone-and-without-ticket/#axzz2hC0Jm7He

http://www.ibtimes.com/9-year-old-boy-manages-fly-minnesota-las-vegas-alone-without-ticket-1415566

http://www.ktvb.com/news/regional/9-year-old-boy-hops-flight-to-Las-Vegas-without-ticket-226766881.html

http://fox6now.com/2013/10/07/boy-hops-plane-to-vegas-apparently-alone-and-without-ticket/

http://wrbw.membercenter.worldnow.com/story/23622074/boy-boards-plane-at-minn-airport-without-ticket

http://www.wtae.com/news/national/Officials-Boy-flies-to-Vegas-with-no-ticket/-/9681152/22303632/-/mpyj29/-/index.html

“The GOP/Tea Party: Tilting at Windmills!

It’s time to Break It Down!

This battle is intriguing…in a Pablo PicassoDon Quixote kind of way.   The Government (at least parts of it), has shut down, the Patient Protection andAffordable Care Act (Obamacare) Health Exchanges are open.  Score that the President 1, the GOP/Tea Party 0.

Do you want to hear (or read) my favorite, (self-made) riddle?  Here it is, anyway:

What part of Obamacare do Republicans and Tea Party members hate most?

The answer to the riddle is the “Obama part!

If you appreciate irony, savor this moment. It is surely golden.

That’s it.  No cross-references for the sake of balance, nada to a dozen or more hot links to provide depth, no to witty repartee or interesting side bar inserted expressly for cool points, and definitely zero rapprochement to ease the concerns of the infidels with differing opinions.

This one is for the folks whose candidate of choice actually won the last Presidential Election.  You may remember him as the guy whose signature program (the one every Democratic President since Harry Truman has tried to implement) was:

Voted on and approved by the U.S. House of Representatives

Voted on and approved by the U.S. Senate

Signed into law by the now (two-term…I still like the sound of that) President

Upheld and affirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court as the law of the ever-loving land!

Enjoy as you read my post and reflect on “The GOP/Tea Party: Tilting at Windmills.”  I’m done…really; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pablo_Picasso

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don_Quixote

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tilting_at_windmills

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/rapprochement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act

“Ted Cruz: We Need 100 More!”

It’s time to Break It Down!

Really?

Most of us know that Texas Senator Ted Cruz is spearheading the Tea Party/GOP initiative to shutdown the Federal Government in an effort to defund the program known as Obamacare.  The Senator, who has roots in Cuba (where his father was born & was a one time supporter of the Castro Regime), and in Calgary, Alberta (That’s in Canada in the unlikely event you are operating at a cultural literacy or geography deficit), is slowly but surely filling out the palette that is his personal profile.

In one of the best-kept secrets of competitive politics, the Senator has been positioning himself to make a run for the Oval Office in 2016.  At age 42, he is at the opposite end of the chronological spectrum relative to Senator John McCain and Governor Mitt Romney, the last two GOP Nominees for the Presidency.  That and his Latino heritage position him, along with Florida Senator Marco Rubio, also 42 and of Cuban descent, as prospective darlings among Republican Party hopefuls for 2016.

It’s early, but not too soon for various elements of candidate behavior to be “interesting.”  As a rule, I do not immerse myself in the intricacies of GOP Party politics, especially three years for before a Presidential election.  I must admit, however, I’m still waiting for evidence that Senator Cruz has passed the requisite Trump…I mean, Litmus test.  You know, the one in which someone of mixed heritage, or extra-national birth is required to produce a birth certificate.  I kid, I kid; a college transcript will do!

Lest I digress too far, the gist of this essay is the completion of the quote used in the Title, above.  To be clear, a couple of weeks ago, on the anniversary of Nine-Eleven, the Junior Senator from Texas built a Bridge too far!”  Here is the complete quote.  He said, in remarks at a Heritage Foundation event:

“It’s every bit as true nowas it was then.  “We need 100 morelike Jesse Helms in the U.S. Senate.”

 The then, to which Senator Cruz referred, was the occasion of John Wayne making a $5,000.00 contribution to Senator Jesse Helms, who died in 2008, and following up his donation with a flattering expository comment.  May God rest the souls of both Mr. Wayne, and Senator Helms.

Having said that, the one-time Senior Senator from my home state was an enthusiastic opponent of all things civil rights.  Senator Helms, a 30-year member of the U.S. Senate, opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which he called the single most dangerous piece of legislation ever introduced in Congress.  He was against the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  He was, by many accounts, the single most ardent opponent of the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday, and in 1983 staged a 16-day filibuster in an attempt to block the holiday.  In 1988, he opposed the Kennedy-Hatch AIDS bill, and argued there “is not one single case of AIDS in this country that cannot be traced in origin to sodomy.”  This is a sampling of Senator Helms’ stand on the issues of his day: positions of which the Senator was damn proud.

For his part, Senator Cruz revealed that his first-ever political contribution was to Senator Helms.  I suppose that is revealing in its own right.

The GOP is in part salivating over the prospect of a Cruz candidacy because of his heritage, and the notion that by picking him, or someone like him, the Party will instantly become more desirable, or at least less toxic, among ethnic demographics.  This “peeling” of the onion that is Ted Cruz should be seen as an incredibly eye-opening sequence of events.  The scale of the irony here is quite simply incalculable.

Never mind Presidential politics.  After all, the 2016 election is still 1,140 days away.  Alternately, a government shutdown, should one occur, is a mere six days from now.  That the leader of the “Shut Down the Government” movement has cast himself as a devotee of “Senator No,” on its face, seems a case of remarkable transparency.  I would suggest you know all you need to about this gentleman, both as it pertains to the 2016 Presidential Election, and to shutting down the government.

To paraphrase another renown Republican icon (Nancy Reagan), I encourage you to Just say no to the uncivilized antics of the Junior Senator from Texas.  Remember what this assertion means; a U.S. Senate filled with Jesse Helms clones… Ted Cruz: “We Need 100 More!”

Really?

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Cruz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protection_and_Affordable_Care_Act

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/11/ted-cruz-jesse-helms_n_3909610.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Heritage_Foundation

http://www.ask.com/question/what-is-the-definition-of-extranational

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_Say_No

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Reagan

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marco_Rubio

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Helms

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tea_Party_movement

Republicans Call President Obama Tone Deaf: More GOP Legerdemain!

It’s time to Break It Down!

Let’s establish one thing up front; Aaron Alexis, the 34-year old practicing Buddhist, and suspected gunman who killed twelve people in Building 197 in the Washington Navy Yard Monday, was a black man.  While that factoid pales in comparison to the horrendous, indefensible, and senseless acts he committed Monday, before authorities killed him, it had to be noted.  In fact, I had to write those words.

In the past, I have pointed out that the history of mass shootings in America is littered with the names of, presumably angry and/or sick, white men.  In longitudinal terms, that fact still stands.  Ex-police officer Christopher Dorner’s California shooting spree in February and now, Alexis’ scurrilous acts this week deviate from the trend line.  Do not get it twisted.  The reality is their actions have not re-ordered all we know about the who of those committing these heinous crimes.  It does once again however underscore the havoc and violence that widespread and “too easy” access to guns can cause.  In the case of Mr. Alexis, the records indicate he had a temper, heard strange voices, and had a history of gun violence.  In retrospect, his high-level security clearance to military facilities is in question.  SMDH!

That is all so unfortunate.  However, even in the aftermath of this most recent episode, a number of gun advocates have lamented the fact that more of the victims did not have their own guns.  It is as though they wish for a return to the ethic of the Wide Wild West.

That is food for thought.  But the focus of this brief commentary is the Republican response to President Obama’stone” in his comments made shortly after Monday’s incident.  It should be noted that at the top of his comments during a White House briefing, President Obama called the act cowardly, and demanded a seamless investigation between local and federal authorities.

The rub, it seems, is he did not stop there.  He went on to speak about developments in the Syrian conflict, and then to chide Republicans for threatening to shut down the government because they may not get all they want…which as you probably know, is the rescission of Obamacare.  The cavalcade of GOP brass who took exception to the President holding their Party accountable included:

  • House Speaker John Boehner called it a shame the President could not rise above partisanship.
  • Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus tweeted it was disappointing that the President didn’t rise above partisanship
  • Former House Speaker, Newt Gingrich, who has his own history with shutting down the government, channeled President Reagan, noting that Mr. Reagan postponed the State of the Union Address because he realized the Country needed to be in mourning.
  • Alex Castellanos, a key GOP Strategist, called the press conference self-congratulatory and referred to the President as tone deaf.

It’s clear, the GOP really doesn’t want any spotlight placed on the fact that many of them would like to grind government to a halt.  It is even more apparent that they do not wish to be reminded of the fact that the war they were for, before they were against it, before the President backed it, before he sought the Congressional approval the GOP insisted he needed, before he asked for it, may actually be resolved through diplomacy anyway.  OMG!

The limitlessly irreverent Bill Maher coined a phrase recently, “Black-track.”  The definition…”When a politician changes his mind because he learns President Obama agrees with him.”  Amen Bill; the truth will set you free.  Meanwhile, Republicans Call Obama Tone Deaf: More GOP Legerdemain!”  I call that claim BS!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

https://www.google.com/search?q=aaron+alexis&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=xCI5UpWDGNOw4APen4HQCA&sqi=2&ved=0CF0QsAQ&biw=1093&bih=496&dpr=1

http://www.whitehouse.gov/five-years-later?utm_source=email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=email239-text2&utm_campaign=economy

http://www.news4jax.com/politics/Did-Obama-strike-the-wrong-tone-on-Monday/-/1875986/21985414/-/yab1vcz/-/index.html

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/17/us/navy-yard-shooting-main/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2013/09/17/alexis-fort-worth-life/2826519/

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/aaron-alexis-34-is-dead-gunman-in-navy-yard-shooting-authorities-say/2013/09/16/dcf431ce-1f07-11e3-8459-657e0c72fec8_story.html

http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/53034674#53034674

http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local/Aaron-Alexis-Fort-Worth-Arrest-Report-223953911.html

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-navy-yard-aaron-alexis-hallucinations-20130917,0,1025320.story

http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-navy-shooter-profile-20130917,0,3662076.story

Calling All Patriots; Nine-Eleven Ten Years Later

It’s time to Break It Down!

The buzz for today, nationally as well as globally, will center, undoubtedly, on the potential for a “Syrian Solution.”  Last night’s speech by President Obama and how much it did or did not move the dial on public opinion will naturally be integrated into most conversations on the subject.

Instead of focusing on this latest development of a saga that has been unfolding for the past two and a half years, I am going to re-post a “Break It Down” entry from two years ago.  Today is the Twelfth Anniversary of Nine-Eleven; a day America can never forget.  While I am hopeful, but not expectant, that President Putin, Secretary Kerry, or even POTUS will propose a diplomatic solution that will resolve the Syrian conflict, obviating President Obama’s need to execute or abandon his call for military action against Syria’s Assad, I ask that you please direct your attention to the horror that was September 11, 2001.

(From the Archives, September 7, 2011)

Do you remember where you were, Tuesday, September 11, 2001?

Next Sunday we will observe the 10th Anniversary of the day that has come to be known simply as, Nine-Eleven (9/11).  That day 10 years ago, America lost, in one fell swoop, its blissful innocence, its long-standing appearance of invulnerability, and its deeply ingrained sense of security.  By some accounts, what it retained is it’s self-righteous (some would say) belief in American Exceptionalism and entitlement; but that is a conversation for another post.

Suddenly we were at war, and the fight, had, uncharacteristically, come to us, straightway.  This battle was personal, and it was on our home turf; no longer some shadowy ideological military exercise, or guerrilla warfare episode, played out on foreign soil, half a world away.

U.S. House of Representatives Joint Resolution 71 was introduced with 22 co-sponsors (11 Republicans and 11 Democrats) and approved by a vote of 407-0 on October 25, 2001 (with 25 members not voting).  The bill passed unanimously in the Senate on November 30, 2001.  The Resolution requested that the President designate September 11th each year as Patriot Day.  President George W. Bush signed the Resolution into law December 18, 2001 (as Public Law 107-89).

On this day, the President directs that the American flag be flown at half-staff at individual American homes, at the White House, and on all U.S. government buildings and establishments, home and abroad.  This year, President Obama has deemed the day one of National Remembrance and ServicePresident and Mrs. Obama will commemorate the day by spending time at the Pentagon, in Arlington, VA, at Shanksville, PA, and in New  York, at the site of the World Trade Center Towers, the three sites of the four Nine-Eleven plane crashes.

The President, who will attend a function at the National Cathedral in Washington, DC, Sunday evening, plans to honor the victims, the respondents to the disasters, and the military personnel who have served in Iraq and Afghanistan, and in other missions aimed at rooting out the terrorists responsible for the Nine-Eleven attacks.

Even a decade later, with ten years worth of context building, and development of perspective, the numbers behind Nine-Eleven are chilling.  Nearly 3,000 people lost their lives, and thousands of others were injured, and many more sustained post-event trauma.  Examples of the carnage include: 

  • 2,977 Victims killed (not including the 19 hijackers)
  • 2,606 Killed at the World Trade  Center  Towers
  • 125 Killed at the Pentagon
  • 40 Killed in Shanksville, PA
  • 87 Killed on American Flight 11/NYC World Trade Center North Tower
  • 60 Killed on United Flight 175/NYC World Trade Center South Tower
  • 59 Killed on American Flight 77/Arlington – The Pentagon
  • 40 Killed United Flight 93/Shanksville, PA
  • 19 Hijackers
  • 246 Killed on the four planes
  • 19 Hijackers Killed (on the four planes)
  • 2,996 Killed on Nine-Eleven
  • 411 Emergency workers killed at the World Trade Centers
  • 341 FDNY firefighters killed
  • 2 Paramedics killed
  • 23 NYPD officers killed
  • 37 Port Authority Police Department officers killed
  • 8 EMT’s killed
  • 658 Employees of Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. (Investment Bank) killed; most of any employer
  • 1,631 Bodies positively identified from World Trade Center Towers
  • 1,122 Bodies (41%) remain unidentified
  • Bone fragments were still being found in 2005 by workers preparing to demolish the damaged Deutsche Bank Building
  • 72 Additional remains found in 2010 by a team of anthropologists and archeologists

A Medical Examiner will continue to try to identify remains in the hope new technology will lead to the identification of other victims.  The death and destruction of Nine-Eleven led to the so-called Global War on Terror.  Mostly the front lines have been in Afghanistan and Iraq.  However, a central intent of the action has been to prevent a recurrence of Nine-Eleven-like events on U.S. soil.

The initial thrust began October 7, 2001 when the U.S., British, and Coalition forces invaded Afghanistan, and in March 2002, the U.S. and Coalition forces launched Operation Anaconda and the Taliban suffered significant losses, and left the region.  In the interim, involvement in the region has ebbed and flowed, but the war, which the Obama Administration has referred to as Overseas Contingency Operation, continues.  In exactly one month from today, we will have been in Afghanistan 10 years.  However, months ago, the War in Afghanistan became the longest war in American History.  We are already in the every day is a new record era.

U.S. Intelligence sources pointed to Al-Qaeda as the probable instigator behind Nine-Eleven.  It’s leader, Osama bin Laden initially denied involvement.  Over time, bin Laden became more emboldened; first conceding involvement, and ultimately admitted that he was instrumental in masterminding the horrific attacks.  During his Presidential Campaign, Mr. Obama declared he would not relent on the hunt for Osama.  The elusive terrorist was thought to be hiding in Pakistan.  Mr. Obama stated bluntly that if reliable intelligence pinpointed bin Laden, he would deploy U.S. forces to find and kill him, which he did on May 2, 2011.

The good news is, over the course of the past decade, there have been no repeat Nine-Eleven events.  That result is partly due to fastidiously focusing on prevention efforts, partly due to the fortuitous failure of would-be terrorists, and partly due to the fateful intervention of alert by-standers.

As we approach Patriot Day 2011, and a decade of Nine-Eleven memories, Americans are advised to be on high alert for potential incursions by terrorists, most likely of the lone wolf variety, where one person acts alone.  So, Calling All Patriots; Nine-Eleven…Ten Years Later,” let’s get ready for a Day of Remembrance and Service.

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com.  A new post is published each Wednesday.  For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/September_11_attacks 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_Day

http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/homeland-security/10th-anniversary-of-9-11

http://www.september11tenyears.blogspot.com/

http://news.yahoo.com/10-anniversary-9-11-plans-largest-day-charitable-153606076.html

http://publicintelligence.net/ufouo-dhs-fbi-ten-year-anniversary-of-911-attacks-warning/

http://publicintelligence.net/ufouo-dhs-fbi-ten-year-anniversary-of-911-attacks-warning/

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/05/06/us-usa-security-trains-idUSTRE7447VS20110506

http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/9-11-Anniversary-10-Years-September-11-Attacks-WTC-.html

http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/local/911-Anniversary-10-Years-After-the-Attacks-Sept-11-DC.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9a9xXlmTHBY&feature=related

http://www.voanews.com/english/news/usa/Obama-to-Speak-at-National-Cathedral-911-Concert-128693008.html

So Whose War Is This, Anyway?

It’s time to Break It Down!

It has long been said, politics makes strange bedfellows.  Henry John Temple, AKA Lord Palmerson, aformer British Prime Minister, is reputed to have asserted, “Britain has no eternal allies and no perpetual enemies; only interests that are eternal and perpetual.”

Recent elements of the Syrian conflict, an aggressive intra-national quarrel that many observers insist has risen to the level of a civil war, in which government-sponsored chemical warfare and genocide have persuaded Americans to choose sides, in a manner of speaking.

Naturally, no one is for perpetuating the conflict.  However, when it comes to the steps Americans favor taking to diffuse the conflict, we, as a nation, are a House divided.  Nowhere is that division more palpable than the nexus between President Obama and the Republican Party.  Since the beginning of the conflict, which emerged from the Syrian version of the Arab Spring, beginning March 15, 2011, Republicans have attempted to force President Obama to kowtow to their wishes and arm the rebels.  They declared Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, Public Enemy Number 1; a true menace to society.

Therefore, it was…until it was not.  A funny, rather a peculiar thing, happened on the way writing the 2013 Edition of the History of the World.  Cue the USA edit.  First, the Assad Regime is alleged to have ramped up chemical attacks on the rebels, still Syrian citizens.  There have been earlier reports of the government launching chemical attacks.  In those earlier reported attacks, a relatively small number of people died.  The numbers have escalated dramatically recently.  Thousands of Syrians have died from attacks; most analysts believe Sarin is responsible for an agonizing Death sequence shown on TV’s around the world.

Then in a move that stunned and apparently agitated Republicans, President Obama, said there was tangible evidence that President Assad and Syrian government forces crossed his pre-established Red Line, and called for military intervention.  Lo and behold, the sacrosanct ideological dicta of the GOP instantly transformed and mutated, as if there had been a tectonic shift in the very plates that underpin all the Party holds dear.  No more adhering to unflinching support of the Military Industrial Complex; now the Guiding Principle, in fact, the only principle that mattered…at least since January 20, 2009, is, whatever President Obama is for, the GOP oligarchy is against.  To wit, whereas before, when the President was not supportive of arming the ill-defined rebels, and when he articulated a clear message conveying his intent to terminate, not launch wars, Republicans consistently:

  • Demanded the President take action in Syria to support the rebels
  • Called the President weak because he did not do so
  • Contended the President was letting Israel     down by not forcing out Assad
  • Accused the President of emboldening Iran     and North Korea,     via his inaction
  • Called for a no-fly zone
  • Asked that the President bomb Syrian Airfields, & command and control.
  • Implied he could/should take this action unilaterally, specifically, without     support in the Region from the Arab, or internationally, from our allies

As has been the case on numerous other issues, the moment the President adapts his position to incorporate the view that it is imperative to act, the GOP gets a raging case of snow blindness, and expresses pure unadulterated disdain for the President’s plan to attack Syria.  They even demanded that he seek Congressional approval for taking the action, even though a limited action, such as that proposed by POTUS, does not require approval by that august body.

It is not hard to imagine, members of the GOP expected the President to by-pass them.  Instead, the President acquiesced and once again gave Republicans a template for forging a bi-partisan alliance; a vexing one-word solution…compromise.

For more than two years, Republicans lobbied relentlessly for this moment.  Once the President offered it up on a platter; go figure!  In somewhat of a yin, yang situation, many Republicans have donned their political body armor, and claim they are ready to vote against endorsing the action the President requested.  “So Whose War Is This, Anyway?”

 I’m done; holla back!

 Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://www.examiner.com/article/republicans-were-for-striking-syria-until-obama-agreed

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_civil_war

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sarin

http://www.cnn.com/2013/09/03/world/meast/syria-civil-war/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bashar_al-Assad

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/440205/Henry-John-Temple-3rd-Viscount-Palmerston

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military%E2%80%93industrial_complex

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republican_Party_(United_States)

Do You Really Care?

It’s time to Break It Down!

I mean, do you…really?

The great “Miley Twerkscaprice has become all the rage over the past couple of days.  The long and mostly short of it is Miley Cyrus performed a duet with Robin Thicke, in the MTV Video Music Awards (VMA’s) Sunday night.  Mr. Thicke currently has his own issues, of course.  Reference his lawsuit againstthe family of Marvin Gaye.  However, that is a conversation for another time; maybe even another forum.

Ms. Cyrus, a former child star rose to fame in her role as Disney’s Hannah Montana.  Born Destiny Hope Cyrus (that’s Miley to you), Country Music singer Billy Ray Cyrus’ daughter Twerked her way into the latest media frenzy during her rambunctious performance Sunday night.  The media has hardly been able to contain itself in rendering critiques, mostly negative, about young Ms. Cyrus’ antics.  It seems the sexually explicit nature of the Country Music scion’s act drove many to near apoplexy.

Twerking is the name of the dance, which she was not particularly good at, by the way.  In the rare event you do not know what it is, check Google, Bing, Urban Dictionary, Twitter, Vine, FaceBook, or some other search engine or social networking tool.  It is a well-documented contemporary art form.  More over, if you ever watched videos of Islanders (Jamaicans, Barbadians, Trinidadians, etc.) dancing, chances are you have seen the precursor to today’s Twerking.

Some folks have speculated that Miley’s father must be mortified, and is off hiding in some dark corner.  That may be the case, but I have my doubts.  Instead, I imagine Ol’ Billy Ray, Lil’ Miley, and every other member of the Cyrus Clan are all somewhere jauntily monitoring the trending Twitter feed, and contemplating the many ways to monetize this latest faux furor.

Want real news?

  1. Egyptian General     Abdul Fatah al-Sisi removed President Mohamed Morsi in a coup & Syrian     President Bashar al-Assad is     gassing his countrymen
  2. The Obama Administration is readying war-making     apparatus in response to Assad
  3. The NSA has been spying on Americans…since 1983
  4. George Zimmerman is seeking reimbursement of     court costs from the State of Florida
  5. North       Carolina     is bringing back Jim Crow era voting policies
  6. The GOP is threatening to shut down the United States     government
  7. Today is the 50th Anniversary of the     March on Washington!

Now tell me, “Do You Really Care about Miley’s Twerking?” 

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miley_Cyrus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Montana

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/tv-movies/vmas-2013-celebs-react-miley-cyrus-robin-thicke-performance-article-1.1437027

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Ray_Cyrus

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robin_Thicke

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Thicke

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twerking

http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/bestoftv/2013/08/26/exp-erin-nsa-officers-spied-on-spouses.cnn.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_Egyptian_coup_d’%C3%A9tat

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323407104579036173795495190.html

http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/08/27/20203855-george-zimmerman-wants-state-of-florida-to-pay-for-defense-expenses?lite

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Crow_laws

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/25/black-america-2013_n_3647789.html

http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/07/25/gop-senators-threaten-government-shutdown-to-derail-obamacare/

Another Republican, Another Private Fundraiser, Another Perfect Storm for Controversy!

It’s time to Break It Down! 

HAPPY BIRTHDAY BREAK IT DOWN!

Tempest fugit (Time Flies)!  Yesterday was another significant milestone in the life and development of “Break It Down!”  I initiated this blog August 20, 2007, on a lark…almost a dare.  That was Six years (and 320 editions) ago.  Having related the story several times over the past several years, I will not repeat the complete details today.

I will note that on that summer’s eve, I contemplated, in five paragraphs, the experience, in reality the lack thereof, of then Senator Barack Obama, as he navigated the early stages of his historic Presidential Campaign.  The prodigious parameters of that history were not evident at the time.  To be sure, over the next 14 ½ months, he bested the odds and won not only the Democratic Nomination, but also the Presidency.  In so doing, my lack of conviction, along with that of many others, in Mr. Obama’s ability to claim the nation’s biggest political prize exposed for what it was; a patently errant assessment.

Briefly, before moving on to the gist of today’s topic, I want to make one more note about the blog.  In addition to this week marking the Sixth Anniversary of Break It Down, this week’s post commemorates the One-year Anniversary of my using WordPress as my primary Host Site.  The link, http://TheSphinxofCharlotte.com  is simpler and more straightforward than the Blogger (Blogspot) link, http://TheSphinxofCharlotte.blogspot.com.  The site design and presentation at Word Press is cleaner, less busy than the one at Blogger.  Please note, I may migrate Break It Down exclusively to WordPress, the blog remains available at both sites for the foreseeable future.

Moving on to the topic du jour, Maine’s Republican Governor, Paul LePage, has denied he said President Obama hates white people.  According to reports in the Portland Press Herald and the Bangor Daily News, two GOP lawmakers from Maine, and one unnamed source in attendance, confirmed the Governor made the comments a private political fundraiser.  If the setting sounds familiar, it may be because it sounds a lot like the environment that served as the launch pad for Governor Romney’s now infamous 47% comments.

Imagine if some interloper had not taped those remarks.  Would Presidential candidate Romney ever have conceded he said that?  It is doubtful.  It is possible that those comments changed the trajectory of the campaign.  In retrospect, isn’t it funny how no one ever accused Mr. Romney of being an “Angry White Man?”  Alas, I digress.  The reality is it is not surprising that Governor LePage has declined to take ownership of his alleged colorful commentary.  Can you blame him?  Really?

Two of the Governor’s fellow Republican lawmakers confirmed Mr. LePage made the comments, but asked that the paper withhold their names, out of fear of retribution.  Would His Honor really do something like that?  I will let you be the judge of that.

I do not know, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Governor said what his colleagues-in-arms say he did.  Moreover, to be fair, there are people who were present at the event who say they did not hear him say it.

In constructing and presenting a defense for the Governor, also known as the official response, Brent Littlefield issued a statement that suggested it was farfetched for anyone to insinuate the Governor is racist, given his life history…a history that, according to the Mr. Littlefield’s statement, includes caring for Devon Raymond, Jr., a Jamaican who attended high school in Maine.  The statement also referenced the Governor’s years of attending the Martin Luther King, Jr. Breakfast.

After just reading that, I find the accusation stunning.  I mean, how much more conclusive could evidence possibly be?  Well, without rushing to judgment, it may be worth noting that Governor LePage has made a few controversial statements in his time.  Earlier this month, he “joked” that he wanted to blow up the headquarters of the Press Herald.

According to the Sunlight Foundation, thepaper’s majority owner, billionaire Donald Sussman, is a major donor to Democratic Super PAC’s in 2012, and over the years.  Mr. Sussman is married to Maine Democrat, Rep. Chellie Pingree.

In June, the Governor made a crude sexual reference having to do with Vaseline (or the lack thereof), when speaking of a Democratic lawmaker.  Last year, he referred to the Internal Revenue Service as the Gestapo,” in his weekly Radio Address.  In other words, even while not rushing to judgment, the alleged sequence of events is conceivable.

If Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, or any of the Fox News analysts claim President Obama hates white people, it really is not a story.  The typical response is those men do not operate as the Party’s “thought leaders.”  In other words, the people did not elect them.  This is true, so I say, meet Paul LePage!

Naturally, the papers contacted the White House for a response.  They did not provide a reply.  Congress members may be home for its five-week end of summer break.  In the interim, it looks as though other GOP Office holders are determined to ensure there is no deficit of inflammatory commentary.  This week, we have…”Another Republican, Another Private Fundraiser, Another Perfect Storm of Controversy!

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

“O”, The Bag Lady!

It’s time to Break It Down!

Chances are you have never heard of Jonathan Goldsmith.  More likely, at least you think you have not.  However, had I introduced him as “The Most Interesting Man in the World,” you might have a better shot at recognizing him.  Moreover, if I told you I was speaking of the lead actor in the Dos Equis beer commercials, you would probably ask, “Why didn’t you say that in the beginning?”

Mr. Goldsmith, AKA, “The Most Interesting Man in the World,” executes, in each commercial, a series of hard to imaging, if not straight-up unbelievable feats, before intoning, as only he can, “I don’t always drink beer, but when I do, I prefer Dos Equis.”  This post, however, is not about Mr. Goldsmith.

I am confident you gleaned, based upon the Title this post is about Oprah, Inc.  In an odd sort of way, Ms. Winfrey’s recent Purse Incident reminded me of Mr. Goldsmith’s character.  Ms. Winfrey is one of the world’s wealthiest and most recognizable figures.  Shopkeepers do not always deny her service, but when they do, she prefers to air it publicly…and air it she did.

In an Entertainment Tonight interview last Monday (August 5, 2013), Ms. Winfrey shared that she was in Zurich, in a (obviously very posh) shop that she declined to name.  She did go on to say a clerk declined to show her a purse she was interested purchasing.  In her version of the story, she asked several times, and indicated her interest in buying the handbag.  The salesperson, as “O” explained it, never did get the purse, and/or allow Oprah to see it.

As Winfrey added, the staffer tried several times to steer her to something “more affordable.”  As it turns out, the subject of Purse-gate was a bag created by American Fashion Designer, Tom Ford, valued at upwards of $35,000Ms. Winfrey related this episode, when the interviewer asked if she ever experienced racism.

To be sure, this kind of thing is a rarity in Oprah World.  After all, she is known on multiple continents, and few who know her would doubt she could afford to purchase a purse, even if it cost nearly $40 grand.  Alas, perhaps in Switzerland, she managed to meander into one of the few alcoves in the modern world where someone in a posh establishment might actually not recognize her countenance on sight.

To Oprah, it apparently seemed logical to conclude that a white clerk who declined to show a black woman an object that cost tens of thousands of dollars did so because she thought the black woman couldn’t afford it, and that qualified as racial profiling; i.e., a racist and discriminatory act.

For the record, Ms. Trudie Goetz, head of the establishment, subsequently identified as Trois Pommes, denies the establishment discriminated against Ms. Winfrey.  She calls the matter a misunderstanding.  She said the clerk simply explained that the bag Oprah wanted to look at was beautiful, but very expensive.  She therefore suggested lower priced models in leather and ostrich, rather than the crocodile model she asked to see.

Last night on a certain cable news program, that shall remain unnamed, a guest, who shall also remain nameless, suggested that Oprah had acted recklessly, by claiming racism in this incident.  Not coincidentally, the party who made this assertion is white, as is the clerk, who has denied her behavior was racist, as is the aforementioned establishment owner who called the incident a misunderstanding.  Well, at least they had a meeting of the minds.

Anyone who knows me well can attest that I am not an Oprahphile.  However, in this case, I find “It walks like a duck, and it quacks like a duck!  President Obama noted in his remarks following the Trayvon Martin verdict that most African Americans have experienced such moments…many times.  It’s probably been a while, but it sounds like Oprah had herself “a moment.”   I agree with ““O,” The Bag Lady!”  Stamp this one with a big Scarlet Letter R…for racist.  

I’m done; holla back!

Read my blog anytime by clicking the link: http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com or http://thesphinxofcharlotte.blogspot.com. A new post is published each Wednesday.

To subscribe, click on Follow in the bottom right hand corner of my Home Page at http://thesphinxofcharlotte.com; enter your e-mail address in the designated space, and click on “Sign me up.”  Subsequent editions of “Break It Down” will be mailed to your in-box.

For more detailed information on a variety of aspects relating to this post, consult the links below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprah_Winfrey

http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/13/showbiz/oprah-winfrey-racism-switzerland/index.html?hpt=hp_t3

http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/oprah-winfrey-accuses-trois-pommes-clerk-of-discrimination-brand-rep-denies-it-201398

http://www.marriott.com/hotels/local-attractions.mi?marshaCode=zrhdt&cityId=122&attractionId=138396

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Most_Interesting_Man_in_the_World

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U18VkI0uDxE

http://beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/57/1907

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Ford

http://www.google.com/#bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&ei=lAcLUrDeFva84AO9i4GwBQ&fp=faeff18174a03a04&q=trudie+goetz+pictures&revid=1973365158&sa=X&ved=0CH8Q1QIoAQ

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/20/us/politics/transcript-obama-speaks-of-verdict-through-the-prism-of-african-american-experience.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entertainment_Tonight

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama